Author Topic: Hammereditor attacks RTB servers - The discussion thread  (Read 59051 times)

You are playing a game, like child.

See. He was just playing a little game.

Burden of proof is with you, hammer. You already said pacnet didn't do it.

That leaves only one of your stupid excuses left. Prove it or you're guilty.

I love how he managed to undermine his own argument by telling us it couldn't be malware and saying it wasnt pacnet

Its glorious

I have to admit something:
Pacnet did not do the attack.
About damn time you admitted your defeat.

protip: he posted in general discussion admitting that he did it

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=244331.0

Someone explain this to me before I think he is admitting to it:
I faked the file with Resource hacker.
(I just woke up, so please, tell me what is going on here.)

(I just woke up, so please, tell me what is going on here.)

Read the topic? It's right in front of you. 1 + 1 = 2

I mean-
Err- Screw it, just gonna start another drama topic on myself.

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=244331.0

Someone explain this to me before I think he is admitting to it:(I just woke up, so please, tell me what is going on here.)
hammereditor launched a crappy small dos attack on rtb hosting's ny04 node from his slow home network, somehow managed to create lag, and got banned
then he said it was malware, then he said it wasnt malware, then said it was his brother, then he played the detective game on himself, then he gave us a fake malware that made no sense when I tried opening it, then he admitted that the malware was fake and that he is going to stop ham host

Read the topic? It's right in front of you. 1 + 1 = 2
and it has 34 pages

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=244331.0

Someone explain this to me before I think he is admitting to it:(I just woke up, so please, tell me what is going on here.)
He previously in the topic admitted Pacnet (his brother) did NOT do it.

Then he admitted there that he faked the "malicious file."

That and the fact that he's resigning the hosting service "out of shame" quite clearly means that he's (indirectly) admitting that he did it.

And now his freshly acquired alt is going to get banned too.

He could have just owned up to it, and moved on.

But no.

I have to admit something:
Pacnet did not do the attack.



really
you have to do this in such a roundabout way
it bothers me so much I drew that for the sole purpose of this post

(though I did see the GD thread but this is late because I was drawing this)

[IM G]http://i.imgur.com/vo1qUVv.png[/img]

really
you have to do this in such a roundabout way
it bothers me so much I drew that for the sole purpose of this post

(though I did see the GD thread but this is late because I was drawing this)

do you draw research for friends