It's not genetics, but if the disease is contagious, the mother could give it to her child. And once again, marriage would not basically eradicate stds. You can still contract diseases when you are married, it does not prevent it. If you're taking it from the perspective that adults are more careful than younger people, that's not entirely true. Not all adults are careful with love like that, especially in research where stds are bound to show up.
do you not understand? you cannot get an std through genetics. that is literally impossible.
both of them having an std would imply that the parents of either one or both of them were infected and that the infected person went their ENTIRE LIFE without knowing they were infected. this either implies they are entire asymptomatic or have the iq of dirt
GOLD STAR
YES. THE SPREAD WOULD BE SEVERELY LIMITED. 20 YEARS WOULD BE PLENTY OF TIME FOR ANY CASES OF COLLATERAL DAMAGE TO REALIZE THEY WERE INFECTED AND SEEK TREATMENT BEFORE THEY SPREAD IT FURTHER.
waiting for marriage would make it so that the maximum number of people that the disease could be spread to would be one. the only time this would not occur would be if a child was born infected, and the person and their spouse would almost certainly know of their infection beforehand
YES. NOT SETTING MYSELF ON FIRE IS PREVENTING ME FROM BEING BURNED, TOO.
That's impossible and would never happen, first of all. Second, people could get married right then and there and have love. It would NOT eradicate it because there's bound to be an adult couple ready to get married and go through loveual intercourse.
Also, I absolutely love how you are starting to use all caps now. And guess what, even if you don't set yourself on fire, something could burn you, exactly like your main argument. It doesn't make you immune or it doesn't fully prevent you from getting burned. Sure, it lessens the chances, but the chances aren't 0, Kearn.
