BAM Development (see page 25)

[Aplem]

Sounds like this is going to be fantastic. gj port

[Ad Bot]

[Lugnut]

* and lugnut, and evar, and ipquarx, and nullable, and brian smith, and everyone else who had any part in this

[Port]

Also remember that RTB was released under license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/)

I appreciate that you're trying to do good, but don't just straight up use other people's work.

This is being addressed here:
https://github.com/bam-org/System_BAM/issues/2

[Advanced Bot]

Could I help moderate files for BAM? Could I help moderate the discussion rooms?

[Subpixel]

Could I help moderate files for BAM? Could I help moderate the discussion rooms?

i thought you were going to moderate

[EazyE]

i thought you were going to moderate

[img]http://i.imgur.com/D30jnh3.png[/img

lololololol

[Port]

Could I help moderate files for BAM? Could I help moderate the discussion rooms?

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=233610.msg6640944#msg6640944

[nerd of the week]

i thought you were going to moderate
-snip-

I made that in sketchbook in like 2 mins ok if I had more time I would make a better one but I have a pt job I'm taking online courses in addition to school which gives me zero time for stuff I'm sending this from my phone on break
Bam made in 5 mins with my windows phone

[Chrono]

It worked fine for RTB, the main issue was the lack of people willing to commit their time to trawl through all the bullstuff submissions you get - trust me, you won't be prepared for this.

You should really focus less time on approving addons and the mechanics behind it and more on features the community is going to benefit from.

You did have about 4 or so extras waiting for their promotions but I guess RTB stopped before it got that update Ephi was going to do before promoting them.

i thought you were going to moderate

[img]http://i.imgur.com/D30jnh3.png[/img]

I don't see how that should stop him from moderating both.

Speaking of BLC, both of those logos look bad.

[Ipquarx]

We can't just approve random people for such a position. People like the devs of the operation are kind of a given to be administrators, but for others there should be some sort of process where we can identify who would make a good mod. We can't just go around accepting positions willy nilly like that and hope it works out.

[Advanced Bot]

i thought you were going to moderate

It will not work because dev is extremely slow. It might continue, but I do not know.

http://forum.blockland.us/index.php?topic=233610.msg6640944#msg6640944

As in, could I help with BAM?

[Zeblote]

As in, could I help with BAM?

He's saying that you do not have the knowledge required for reviewing add-ons

[DontCare4Free]

We can't just approve random people for such a position. People like the devs of the operation are kind of a given to be administrators, but for others there should be some sort of process where we can identify who would make a good mod. We can't just go around accepting positions willy nilly like that and hope it works out.

IMO, open up the review/commenting phase to the public (but ofc don't make it available ingame and on the actual browsing area).

He's saying that you do not have the knowledge required for reviewing add-ons

That was a year ago.

[tetronaught]

i thought you were going to moderate

May I just point out, that is not the official logo.



This is:

[Port]

IMO, open up the review/commenting phase to the public (but ofc don't make it available ingame and on the actual browsing area).

Yep, the pages containing reviewer discussion for submissions will be publicly available (probably unlisted though; submitter will get the link automatically). We should probably hide the code tab to people other than reviewers and the submitter until it's approved though, since people who have no clue what they're doing might end up trying to stitch it together and potentially breaking their installation with a malicious add-on.

Thoughts on letting the person who submitted the add-on comment there?