Poll

Crucify Night Foxscotch?

Yes
26 (70.3%)
No
11 (29.7%)

Total Members Voted: 37

Author Topic: Straight Megathread - i didn't expect to get this far  (Read 43266 times)

Biloveuality is an exclusive attraction to males and females, and panloveuality is an attraction to all genders. A lot of panloveuals identify as bi because not many people are familiar with non-binary genders.

Why is it even necessary to divide those into two categories when they're essentially the same thing? "I forget everybody."

Biloveuality is an exclusive attraction to males and females, and panloveuality is an attraction to all genders. A lot of panloveuals identify as bi because not many people are familiar with non-binary genders.

i hope you're not implying there's more than three genders.

i hope you're not implying there's more than three genders.
I hope you're not implying there's more than two genders.

Why is it even necessary to divide those into two categories when they're essentially the same thing? "I forget everybody."
Because some people don't like non-binary genders. This isn't exactly rocket science.

i hope you're not implying there's more than three genders.
I know for sure there's more than two.

Why is it even necessary to divide those into two categories when they're essentially the same thing? "I forget everybody."
because it's more specific...

I hope you're not implying there's more than two genders.

then explain what your dad is

 :cookieMonster: :cookieMonster: :cookieMonster:

I hope you're not implying there's more than two genders.
There are, at a biological level, three genders: those who have both a peepee and a vagoo.
You can bet that there are nuts that claim there more though, and those are the sort of people who really just need to cut the chuuni stuff out.

because it's more specific...
Because some people don't like non-binary genders. This isn't exactly rocket science.
I don't like fat chicks, that doesn't mean it needs a different loveuality.


I don't like fat chicks, that doesn't mean it needs a different loveuality.
"fat chicks" aren't really comparable to an entire gender

I don't like fat chicks, that doesn't mean it needs a different loveuality.
But being fat isn't a gender. That, and biloveuality, outside of it's common "I forget everybody" meaning as you've described, fits for those who are simply turned off by herms.

There are, at a biological level, three genders: those who have both a peepee and a vagoo.
There are also guys with vaginas, girls with richards, and people with nothing. Really, anything can go on with a person's body given the right conditions, lol.

There are also guys with vaginas

I've tried to go a long time without thinking of that.

forgetin

forget

"fat chicks" aren't really comparable to an entire gender
But being fat isn't a gender. That, and biloveuality, outside of it's common "I forget everybody" meaning as you've described, fits for those who are simply turned off by herms.
I don't see why the comparison doesn't work, both are physical properties that one prefers or doesn't.

There are also guys with vaginas, girls with richards
There are delusional people, yes.

and people with nothing.
As far as I know, that doesn't naturally happen, but I can't be bothered to check; feel free to if you care enough.

have snake == man
have vagina == woman
have neither == woah dude wtf are you doin you need privates

As far as I know, that doesn't naturally happen, but I can't be bothered to check; feel free to if you care enough.

Unfortunately, I actually know the answer to this. It does happen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penile_agenesis_and_testicular_agenesis