Author Topic: Ubisoft removes female asassins in next asassin's creed - Tumblr loses it  (Read 19321 times)

the funniest thing is

how many tumblr radicals have ever even played AC


little to none

the funniest thing is

how many tumblr radicals have ever even played AC

Yeah this was pretty stupid.
I don't even play the series anymore but I do believe this should be brought to concern.



i feel bad for anita. she asks for like, 20k to make the series and gets 300k, thus making her have unbelievable standards, and then she made some good points in her video and said nothing inflammatory and got death threats.

i don't agree with a lot of what she says, but seriously

educate me, i'd like to know
I already mentioned geishas, bro
Here you go:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlotte_Corday

Quote
was a figure of the French Revolution. In 1793, she was executed under the guillotine for the assassination of Jacobin leader Jean-Paul Marat

Done and done.
(Wonder if she'll be in the game?)



okay what in the actual forget are you talking about

I was referring to needlessly breaking the game's universe by giving the women of france rights (during the very beginning of the revolution) despite the american revolution and all that other jazz not having it

you could already recruit female assassins in acb and acr, plus there was that liberation thing a little while ago
No one's asking about rights.
People are asking about female assassins.
I'm pretty sure you don't need rights to be an assassin because no one has that right unless employed by your government, which, if you knew anything about Assassin's Creed, you're not.



the funniest thing is

how many tumblr radicals have ever even played AC


Actually a lot of them. Because they seemed pretty content and excited about previous games in the series.



i feel bad for anita. she asks for like, 20k to make the series and gets 300k, thus making her have unbelievable standards, and then she made some good points in her video and said nothing inflammatory and got death threats.

i don't agree with a lot of what she says, but seriously
As much as I don't agree with the death threats and how she can't really help it if people threw a truckload of money at her, she really didn't do enough research into the games and made a lot of really biased points.

As much as I don't agree with the death threats and how she can't really help it if people threw a truckload of money at her, she really didn't do enough research into the games and made a lot of really biased points.
she didn't do any research

literally all of the game clips she uses are stolen from youtube let's players. and she releases a new episode like once a year. she is a con artist as simple as that

I'm pretty sure you don't need rights to be an assassin because no one has that right unless employed by your government, which, if you knew anything about Assassin's Creed, you're not.
I don't see why you're being so personal about this

she didn't do any research

literally all of the game clips she uses are stolen from youtube let's players. and she releases a new episode like once a year. she is a con artist as simple as that
did you even watch the videos?

this had better not become ubisoft's call of duty

I hate it when games get sequels every year

I don't see why you're being so personal about this
Because you're not making good points, no offense.
this had better not become ubisoft's call of duty

I hate it when games get sequels every year
They put 80% or so in their AC budget sooo

did you even watch the videos?
yes, and they were mostly awful.

this had better not become ubisoft's call of duty

I hate it when games get sequels every year
it seems like call of duty and assassins creed are having a kindergarten fight over who can release games faster


oops double post

this had better not become ubisoft's call of duty

I hate it when games get sequels every year
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vgk8SBmNh28

yes, and they were mostly awful.
i'd like to know what you thought about them, cus all i've heard is people say that and rarely articulate it

Because you're not making good points, no offense.
so somehow that justifies a personal attack?