but wait...
if scott confirmed they're haunted..
and if scott ALSO said that fnaf2 is a sequel.....
then is scott just loving us with both of them, and fnaf2 is pretty much just a sequel to fnaf1, and also that the animatronics ARENT haunted?
plus, didn't scott also say the animatronics are haunted, but not in the way we think they are, meaning its not the dead children?
No, he wasn't lying about the animatronics being haunted. Why else would he add the "five dead children" subplot?
And check out auzman's post on page 98. He pretty much proved the theory that FNAF 2 is a prequel.
And as a response to auzman's post, do you remember on night 6 in the sequel(prequel)? The phone guy said someone used the yellow freddy suit in the back. He didn't say who used it, or for what purpose. I'm willing to bet that the person who used it was the killer, who lured five children into the back with a freddy fazbear suit. If this happened during FNAF 2, then it makes sense why it's on a newspaper in FNAF 1.