Alright then, I challenge you to be the first person in Blockland's roughly 10-year history to copyright a blockland save and show us the legal documents for it on here for everyone to see.
Anyways, accusing people of infringing copyright is one thing. Proving they infringed it is another. There is no legitimate way to prove someone copyrighted a blockland save file just from seeing it in a youtube video or on a website. You'd have to see the actual blockland save file and prove the code in the text file matches up, which raises many more problems. You could easily circumvent such things by modifying the save file and shifting the entire build into different coordinate points on the invisible build grid (on which all blockland bricks adhere to) to change a large portion of the save file code. I'd bet that if you duplicated the build, rotated it 90 degrees, moved it over 50 blocks, and then changed the build's paint scheme slightly, telling the similarities in the code would be quite difficult.
Even so, youtube videos and third-party websites go outside the realm of what we were talking about. We're talking about using other people's builds and claiming them as your own on blockland servers. What are you going to do about that if you "copyright" a build and someone hosts it on their blockland server? Are you going to complain to your town court and ask them to cancel that person's ISP? Or are you going to go to Badspot with your legal documents and ask him to revoke their key? Absolutely ridiculous.
Planr, just stop arguing for the sake of arguing. You know as much as we do that there is a colossal difference between plagiarism and freedom of use.
Agreed, there is a difference between plagiarism and freedom of use. However, the definition of plagiarism for an item is highly dependent upon the permitted freedoms of use. And blockland servers have a very high freedom-of-use factor in that regard. Ergo, there's nothing Pecon or Ipquarx can do about it.
I think I've made my point enough, so I suppose I'm done arguing with Ipquarx about this. I'm convinced he's just being stubborn at this point.