Poll

Your view?

It's good
149 (90.9%)
It's bad
15 (9.1%)

Total Members Voted: 164

Author Topic: Australia releases "no jab, no pay" policy  (Read 9430 times)

lmao I like the state

All you guys are right, I withdraw.

I will always defend someone's right of choice which they have though, even if vaccination is better.

I need to go mow the lawn now
BUT WHY THO? Why resist vaccinations even when you recognize that they are nessicary?


Well now let's say that a vaccine is released with bad side effects or a high chance of allergies. Parents are apparently forced to go through with it anyway or lose their healthcare.
That doesn't happen for a very special reason:
All vaccines go through rigorous testing.

By people 200% smarter than the average person in medicine and vaccination-related fields.

If you use that, then you might as say that it is unsafe to take over-the-counter medicine because there might be something wrong with it.

BUT WHY THO? Why resist vaccinations even when you recognize that they are nessicary?
Ask them, I plan on vaccinating

Ask them, I plan on vaccinating
So you don't even believe in your own arguments? I bet that's why they were so stuffty.

My mom isn't anti-vacc, but she is for the freedom to choose whether or not to inject your children with stuff.
you should be able to choose what you do and don't inject your child with.
But there's no need to make this choice because there's no legitimate reason not to get vaccines

Australia's nanny-state at work once again.
"nanny" laws are necessary in cases where people are hurting others because they don't know wtf they're doing

I don't really care, if your debate is found on the basis of disrespecting someones beliefs then you probably shouldn't of debated
But if someone's religion requires disrespecting the health of others, that's ok?
Either way, religious groups can claim exemptions from this requirement
« Last Edit: April 12, 2015, 02:45:58 PM by Headcrab Zombie »

So you don't even believe in your own arguments? I bet that's why they were so stuffty.
No need to be rude, I just didn't want to debate, a lot of them were logical.

No need to be rude, I just didn't want to debate, a lot of them were logical.
1. You just debated for like 7 pages straight, if you didn't want to you could have stopped posting
2. Your arguments were not logical in the least

we should ask the children/babies to see what they think
i win

we should ask the children/babies to see what they think
i win
"i dont like needles"

I think there needs to be required curriculum/workshops educating students about vaccines. Maybe the parents should be encourged to attend even. This misinformation is costing lives. But anyway, I'm glad that Australia has done this.

1. You just debated for like 7 pages straight, if you didn't want to you could have stopped posting
2. Your arguments were not logical in the least
I debated that people have the right to choose which is true and cannot be charged with homicide on the basis of not vaccinating a child if theirs or someone else's dies. They can be charged with negligence, this is true in the United States but it is up to them how to raise them and nobody should be able to intervene unless they are directly and physically harming them through means of contact. This is based on United States law and also true. And I've been to Antarctica and I can say it is you as the consumer who will change the world for everyone eventually, just as choosing not to vaccinate with change society for everyone. They are both individual decisions. This is also true.

I reiterate, I am with vaccination but believe in freedom of choice.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2015, 02:56:51 PM by Kansas »

Whoever doesn't vaccinate their children are loving dumbasses, simple as that.

Sometimes vaccines can cause adverse reactions on people, but the number is so so SO much lower than the probability of contracting the diseases that are life threatening.

Honestly do mankind a favour and loving vaccinate your children.

I debated that people have the right to choose which is true and cannot be charged with homicide on the basis of not vaccinating a child if theirs or someone else's dies. They can be charged with negligence, this is true in the United States but it is up to them how to raise them and nobody should be able to intervene unless they are directly and physically harming them through means of contact. This is true. And I've been to Antarctica and I can say it is you as the consumer who will change the world for everyone eventually, just as choosing not to vaccinate with change society for everyone. They are both individual decisions. This is also true.
Yeah ya see you just said you didn't WANT to debate which is what I was referring to. You didn't have to bring up a bunch of irrelevant points in a badly articulated post.

Yeah ya see you just said you didn't WANT to debate which is what I was referring to. You didn't have to bring up a bunch of irrelevant points in a badly articulated post.
Then don't try to get me to debate with you? Which post are you referring to?