when did i ever say i was talking about that?
why do people keep bringing this up after its already over?
then give me the debates you were talking about. it's not a huge jump to assume that an argument from not too long ago is one of the examples you're referencing, esp since IIRC ipq was involved in it.
He wasn't referring to that, and he provided evidence to that point if I remember correctly and it was still denied.
He posted a youtube video (which is admitted at the end to be completely fabricated and "for fun") and the comments on the video. Neither were valid evidence. If he's got something though, I love to see it. If it really was valid evidence though, then I don't see why he wouldn't have posted it towards the end of it rather than the dumbass youtube comments.
this is one thing back in early 2014
nice that you've actually provided evidence of what i asked for
i should have clarified for more recent evidence
recently i've seen nothing from you but what i described
If you're so hung up on evidence of him being stubborn, you probably should go ahead and post it yourself. Ip's got no obligation to argue against himself. Furthermore, that argument he had in the thread he posted was with
me. If that's not some kind of evidence of him being impartial then I guess I don't know what is.