you're implying that women have no agency to leave themselves
it's not like men have some magical power to just force women to stay there
I guarantee if the genders were reversed, you wouldn't be saying this. In fact, you probably wouldn't say anything at all, but if you did you would still put the blame on men
Their women mostly don't have agency to leave themselves.
It comes down to money.
Refugees are spending their entire fortunes to travel across Europe, paying to be illegally trafficked across the Mediterannean (which is regularly costing them their lives too), and then for train journeys across the EU, as well as food.
Many are making themselves destitute in trying to flee, but that also means they are leaving their wives/sisters/daughters destitute too.
These are Muslim countries where Sharia Law is in place, either entirely (Iraq) or in regards to civil/familial matters (Syria). Women are held to be subservient to their husbands and fathers, and they do not hold on to their own money. Their women have no choice but to stay behind if the man leaves with all their worldly posessions and money.
Not only then are many of these men leaving women behind in a wartorn country where they face famine (Syria has recently had to request seeds from the global seedbank because farming has been so destroyed), mass rape, execution and bombardment from 4 different forces (Syria, Syrian Rebels, CIA, Kurds/the West), they're left to face that with no money at all.
It would be absolutely sickening to see that it were women leaving men behind, or adults leaving children behind, as much as it is to see men leaving women behind.
I would ask you kindly not to go painting me with some brush and claiming my views are only based on some hatred for men.