Author Topic: stufflord and the stuffposting  (Read 28400 times)

motion to just ignore rally and continue with the conversation proper

And I still catch the blame. Incredible.

OP's... Gang? Group of friends? (I don't want to call it a clique to trigger them) is hella desperate to get stufflord out of here.
I mean, yeah, he can be annoying, but so can all of you. And, as BlackParrot said, OP's side is hella desperate to get evidence on there because some evidence is from late August.
/nosupport inb4 this turns into an argument about brown townogies and Riddler somehow gets involved

1 why are you suddenly saying hella so much

2 what exactly is the deal with the clique

like just looking at this topic alone it's obvious it exists, like 5 guys came out of the woodwork all at once to start mindlessly bashing a single target so there must be something going on so why even hide it

1 why are you suddenly saying hella so much
I can't explain it. It just kind of grew on me. In my opinion, it sounds a tad better than "extremely" because it doesn't make the situation look like it's going in the extremes.
(If that was directed at someone else sry)

you know not every statement needs an intensifier

'op's clique is desperate to get stufflord out of here'
'op's side is desperate to get evidence on there because some evidence is from' etc etc

its like adding an exclamation mark at the end of every sentence! its weird and robotic and implies a tone that may not necessarily be the tone youre intending to convey! and will eventually get annoying!

Understood. Sorry for annoying you.

Understood. Sorry for annoying you.
You don't actually need to change what you say for him lol.

You don't actually need to change what you say for him lol.
I know. I'm just apologizing and acknowledging that I used it too much. I'm gonna use hella, but gonna try to not say it as much as I used to.
But yeah, why is the clique against stufflord so desperate to run him out of town, so to speak?

everyone that is against stufflord in this thread
IkeTheGeneric, Nal, TheABELBOTO, Steve54512 (can't get the small 2 because keyboard is not good enough) (maybe, for the against thing), Maxx, Rally (maybe)

everyone that is against Ike and the ragtag group of stufflord haters people supporting Ike in this thread
everybody else (too lazy to actually get all of their names, sorri guise)

In all seriousness, Ike and the others are basically ganging up on stufflord over just simple posts, honestly.
Those 'chainban' posts are because it's gonna look like it'll be a chainban (example: last laugh)
Sometimes a laugh can be in general, but at least it wasn't directly pointed at the OP of the dog thread.
I believe that Ike and the others just need to get a hold of themselves.
But I don't really like how Nal basically attacked Xeid using the 'desperate' way because Nal is equally sounding 'desperate' to attack stufflord.
Not cool, man.

I know. I'm just apologizing and acknowledging that I used it too much. I'm gonna use hella, but gonna try to not say it as much as I used to.
But yeah, why is the clique against stufflord so desperate to run him out of town, so to speak?
I don't know, I'm not part of any clique against stufflord. I don't like him, but I'm not part of a clique.

I don't know, I'm not part of any clique against stufflord. I don't like him, but I'm not part of a clique.
If you're not part of the clique then why are you answering

motion to just ignore rally and continue with the conversation proper
I second this.

If you're not part of the clique then why are you answering
Because you quoted me and asked a question

Has this case concluded that stufflord is innocent?

Because you quoted me and asked a question
Ah. My bad, forgot the hr tag.

Has this case concluded that stufflord is innocent?
Unless the clique wants to circle jerkmore, yeah.

Unless the clique wants to circle jerkmore, yeah.
But what if they trianglejerk!?