Author Topic: The world needs more guns (Read 12465 times)

Frequency · December 03, 2015, 03:34:00 PM

Quote from: -Blok- on December 03, 2015, 03:26:40 PM

It's not like I'm advocating a complete ban on guns.

well okay, but i thought we were talking about the people who are lol

i do feel that background checks and psyche brown townysis should be as thorough as possible though, so that only clean citizens will have the right to bear arms

Ad Bot · Advertisement

-Blok- · December 03, 2015, 03:39:59 PM

Quote from: Frequency on December 03, 2015, 03:34:00 PM

well okay, but i thought we were talking about the people who are lol

Oh....no...

I just said less guns not no guns. Make it harder to get them, that sort of thing.

Frequency · December 03, 2015, 03:44:34 PM

Quote from: -Blok- on December 03, 2015, 03:39:59 PM

Oh....no...

I just said less guns not no guns. Make it harder to get them, that sort of thing.

well, you've got to make it harder for the wrong people to get them.

Zloff · December 03, 2015, 03:44:40 PM

Quote from: SlayerZ99 on December 03, 2015, 03:19:46 PM

Guess what, you can use a pellet gun for target practice too

and I do. I can use my pellet gun to kill things too. The primary purpose of my particular pellet gun is, as advertised, to kill animals, up to the size of a fox. That's approx. the same power as a .22 LR; I wouldn't doubt that a head shot would be lethal to a human.

Quote from: SlayerZ99 on December 03, 2015, 03:19:46 PM

And you said they were illegal in the state. So what, my point is they were purchased and registered legally so your argument that they're illegal in the state is stuff

According to the news, the rifles used in the shooting were legally "assault weapons." The guns were bought legally but then modified in such a way that they, according to california law, have been "manufactured" to fit the description of an "assault weapon"

"assault weapons" are banned in california

the "assault weapon" ban did not stop the criminals from using an "assault weapon" to murder

Willymcmilly · December 03, 2015, 03:46:17 PM

Perhaps there could be a system developed for what kind of guns people can have.
You start with only being allowed to have 1 or 2 kinds of guns, and if you go a long enough time with no gun-related criminal reports, you can own more.

Tayasaurus · December 03, 2015, 03:46:21 PM

Quote from: -Blok- on December 03, 2015, 03:39:59 PM

Oh....no...

I just said less guns not no guns. Make it harder to get them, that sort of thing.

It's pretty piss hard to get guns in some states already. Nobody is interested in the law going overboard with restrictions.

Quote from: Zloff on December 03, 2015, 03:44:40 PM

and I do. I can use my pellet gun to kill things too. The primary purpose of my particular pellet gun is, as advertised, to kill animals, up to the size of a fox. That's approx. the same power as a .22 LR; I wouldn't doubt that a head shot would be lethal to a human.
According to the news, the rifles used in the shooting were legally "assault weapons." The guns were bought legally but then modified in such a way that they, according to california law, have been "manufactured" to fit the description of an "assault weapon"

"assault weapons" are banned in california

the "assault weapon" ban did not stop the criminals from using an "assault weapon" to murder

Also "assault weapon" is a misnomer in a lot of situations and a set of fear words that left and right wing media use to confuse and scare people.

Quote from: Willymcmilly on December 03, 2015, 03:46:17 PM

Perhaps there could be a system developed for what kind of guns people can have.
You start with only being allowed to have 1 or 2 kinds of guns, and if you go a long enough time with no gun-related criminal reports, you can own more.

what a stuffty and abuseable idea.