Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2831706 times)

You'll have a couple days respite while I'm getting hit by the hurricane I guess.

well the stuff you typed is unpleasant so thanks i guess

well the stuff you typed is unpleasant so thanks i guess
stay woke

well the stuff you typed is unpleasant so thanks i guess

They say the truth hurts...

You'll have a couple days respite while I'm getting hit by the hurricane I guess.

THATS WHAT YOU GET FOR NOT HAVING A MORAL BAROMETER

so what do you guys think of race mixing

This has nothing to do with people and everything to do with the law
What are the laws on immigration? You enter legally. You have certain paths to citizenship. If you enter illegally you are deported. That's it. That's all there is to it. There's no need for any special clauses because there shouldn't be illegals in the country to make special clauses for.
illegal immigration as a crime is very simple. if you don't go through the legal processes and live here anyways, you've done something illegal. legal immigration as an action is not. laws concerning legal immigration procedures are convoluted and burdensome and that's relatively undisputed as far as i can tell. the US discussion of immigration focuses on this, not on the legality of illegal immigration, an act which is obviously, by definition, illegal. nobody is saying that criminals aren't criminals, but they may be saying that the law should be changed so that they wouldn't be, or that the law should be changed to be less burdensome to follow. none of this is to say that the actions aren't illegal, they're to offer solutions to fix laws that are broken or unfair. understand that the reason it's frustrating to talk about whether or not illegal immigrants are criminals is because the focus of the discussion is on how best to alter the legal processes, not on how best to punish (or not punish) people who have broken the law.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2017, 05:56:12 PM by otto-san »

Your cigarettegy rhetoric isn't relevant because Mexicans aren't loving people. They are glorified taco dispensers who will occasionally try to steal your entire wallet. They are outclassed by the most basic food chains.
when your argument is half tribal jokes and half "I'm not tribal"

so what do you guys think of race mixing

Thats a tough one


when your argument is half tribal jokes and half "I'm not tribal"

It's only tribal if they're people you loving transmission


nobody is saying that criminals aren't criminals, but they may be saying that the law should be changed so that they wouldn't be, or that the law should be changed to be less burdensome to follow. none of this is to say that the actions aren't illegal, they're to offer solutions to fix laws that are broken or unfair. understand that the reason it's frustrating to talk about whether or not illegal immigrants are criminals is because the focus of the discussion is on how best to alter the legal processes, not on how best to punish (or not punish) people who have broken the law.
see but what you didn't count on is that I can dispute all of this by pointing out the already-known fact that undocumented immigrants have committed a crime.

worse, an illegal crime!


is anything truly wrong with this image because i fully agree with the sentiment it presents

see but what you didn't count on is that I can dispute all of this by pointing out the already-known fact that undocumented immigrants have committed a crime.

worse, an illegal crime!

Gotta be honest, we don't need to be encouraging people to break the law, especially not something as simple as immigration laws

If the law was as simple as you claim, we wouldn't be having this debate right now.

The law is simple, people are just bitching about it being enforced.

deus ex please beat another brown man to death i need to cum

Black on black crime pt. 2

i know washington was buff and everything but i think if he tried to lift that motherforgeter he'd break his arm