POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

Poll

Will Trump get re-elected in 2020?

Yes
No

Author Topic: POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD  (Read 2179109 times)

to be honest im not concerned about Annoying Orange at all seeing as he's proved to not be able to do anything significant
the only thing with what you're talking about acer that's realistically concerning is whether he's normalizing it and setting a bad precedent
Yes that, and why do we want our chief representative of our country provoking a nation like North Korea rather than descalating or ignoring their leader? What if Annoying Orange keeps up this behavior and it proves to spark conflict?
Are you literally shaking?
in my boots.
« Last Edit: January 02, 2018, 10:54:22 PM by Acerblock »

Would you accept what Annoying Orange said if it was spoken?

yes

What if Annoying Orange keeps up this behavior and it proves to spark conflict?

still thinking barely anything would happen in an arguable sense, it's on kim to whether fall for the bait or not of our Big Fat Troll.

still thinking barely anything would happen in an arguable sense, it's on kim to whether fall for the bait or not of our Big Fat Troll.
It doesn't necessarily have to be North Korea, what if it was another nation?
yes
Why though? Is this level of aggression really necessary?

It doesn't necessarily have to be North Korea, what if it was another nation?

apply any president, prime minister, or leader of the nation and replace it with "kim"

apply any president, prime minister, or leader of the nation and replace it with "kim"
Don't you not want our President to provoke a possibly dangerous situation? This precedent just doesn't feel settling at all.

call me handicapped but i think it's gonna take more than a tweet to start nuclear war

Annoying Orange has been insulting Kim Jong-Un for a while now, and like I said before, just because it is a tweet, it doesn't take away from what he is saying.

it doesn't take away from what he is saying.

...that north korea is forgeted up and has a stuffty nuke program?

i think the fact that it is on twitter does sorta misconstrue the tone, i.e. makes it seem less serious than it is

Is this level of aggression really necessary?

>midget man rambles about nuking america
ok

>actual president of america reminds midget man that america has nukes that actually work
AGGRESSION national socialistS WORLD WAR THREE NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN

IMPEACH DOMALD BRAMPF NOOOOOW

I never denied that North Korea is an abysmal nation (although again, Annoying Orange is our President and he called out the poverty and suffering without any class whatsoever. Real nice.), but it's never a good trend to set, in my mind, where you are impulsively provoking other immature global powers.

>midget man rambles about nuking america
ok

>actual president of america reminds midget man that america has nukes that actually work
AGGRESSION national socialistS WORLD WAR THREE NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN
Fair enough, I would never argue Kim Jong-Un's threats are acceptable. But fighting fire with fire is potentially dangerous, there is a reason that the President should have diplomatic skills. Why could Annoying Orange not be firm yet principled at the same time?

Don't you not want our President to provoke a possibly dangerous situation? This precedent just doesn't feel settling at all.

good luck convincing someone like Annoying Orange even if twitter stufffits are any sort of value to kim, but no other leader would be any better bombing or harming the US because of it's president

But fighting fire with fire is potentially dangerous, there is a reason that the President should have diplomatic skills.

i t ' s  o n e  t w e e t