I don't think nature should be used as an example for something being okay. Does eat their fawn's poop and I don't think anyone wants to see some mother eat their toddlers poop.
then "it goes against nature" isn't an argument either
can you prove that gay families are less stable
literally yeshttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoloveual_behavior_in_animalshttp://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150206-are-there-any-homoloveual-animalshttp://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04animals-t.htmlhttp://www.yalescientific.org/2012/03/do-animals-exhibit-homoloveuality/
People complaining about "it goes against nature" should probably get off their computer and go live in a forest.
Is it okay to be gay?
But is it really that bad?
The nature of a species is to ensure its survival and growth.
We've got 7 billion people already, we're not going to really suffer if maybe 1-5% of them don't want to reproduce. You have people who abstain from reproduction for other reasons and they're not slammed for it.
The people abstaining from reproduction aren't dumping genetic material into the exit point of the digestive system.
yea
https://secure.websrvcs.com/templates/System/details.asp?id=25220&PID=395136
And I'm guessing it's a part of evolution to keep species from overpopulating, right?