Author Topic: transgenders allowed in navy july 1st  (Read 12444 times)

This is pretty much the single worst thing you've ever said, in jest or seriously.
We get it, you're not American.


he has a point though. transgenderism and homoloveuality wouldnt even be a problem if it wasnt for WW2

the US was practicing eugenics and we couldve done great things with the program (no blacks) if the national socialists didnt ruin it for everyone
just when I thought this thread would not get any better


he has a point though. transgenderism and homoloveuality wouldnt even be a problem if it wasnt for WW2

the US was practicing eugenics and we couldve done great things with the program (no blacks) if the national socialists didnt ruin it for everyone
quoted for posterity, let this post go down in forum history

quoted for posterity, let this post go down in forum history

and your counterargument?

i didn't know they weren't allowed in the first place

Realistically I don't really care who we let into the navy as long as they meet the mental and physical requirements, and don't compromise on those requirements and lower them to be 'inclusive'. Which is unfortunately what is probably going to happen

What if we become the gaynited gays of gaymerica

Transgenders should be held up to the same standards as any other sailor. If you want in, you have to prove you are capable of it. If you need medication to transform yourself while in service, you shouldn't be in service. If you feel uncomfortable by people changing because of your gender dysphoria, you shouldn't be in the service. If your gender dysphoria makes you relatively combat ineffective, or unable to fully perform your duties, then you shouldn't be in the service.

This is the same thing with women in combat roles. The marines were forced to accept women, and so they did, and so they put them to the same standards as the men. And they are struggling... and people want the standards for women to be relaxed so more pass basic combat training.

all American men should have required 2 years in service after they graduate.
that'd be loving stupid


It was already proven statistically male only squads perform better than female only squads or mixed.

Now we have transgenders. I doubt they would perform better.

This isn't about feelings, when it comes down to it, it's about biology.


It was already proven statistically male only squads perform better than female only squads or mixed.

Now we have transgenders. I doubt they would perform better.

This isn't about feelings, when it comes down to it, it's about biology.
so then whats the issue with having transgenders if they were originally male? if its as black and white as "males are better than females" then i dont see the issue.

unless...
tony are you admitting there is more than one gender?

so then whats the issue with having transgenders if they were originally male? if its as black and white as "males are better than females" then i dont see the issue.

unless...
tony are you admitting there is more than one gender?
When you have a bunch of people with Gender Identity Disorder (and increasingly suicidal), you do not want to allow them into a position where they can cause a massive war.
Unless you're the Japanese. Then, you're fine.