I'm also not paying for it through the taxes
It's no more subsidized than anything else, and the procedures are so rare anyway that the cost is negligible. Should we cut surgeries for people with obesity-related complications since they just ate themselves sick? Or should we deny lung transplants to people who smoked until their lungs fell apart? Applying these weird kinds of moral dualities to medical issues is a seriously dangerous slippery slope.
well of course none of them will say it word for word but this is an accurate representation of what I'm referring to
See, my only beef with this is that the phrase 'top feminist' means literally nothing. Feminism is a decentralized social movement, meaning there's no central authority telling feminists what to do/believe. So just because one feminist thinks one thing does not imply that any other feminist thinks the same.
For instance, let's say a top Republican politician has gone on the record as advocating for conversion therapy as a treatment for homoloveuality: a procedure that often involves electric shocks. Does that mean all Republicans think we should electrocute gays? Of course not. The vast majority of them would never advocate for that.
Wanting to cut off your genitals is harmful.
Because you lose organs? That seems like a malformed definition of 'harmful' when we're talking about surgery.
Someone gave him this at a rally a while back.
Hes even been preaching about protecting the LGBT community from a "hateful and foreign ideology" (gee wonder what that could be)
So if anything hes a pretty pro-LGBT republican
He preaches about protecting everything, even groups that he's planning to forget over. Also, that flag is totally upside down btw.
