Author Topic: The shifting politics of inequality and the class ceiling  (Read 14304 times)

when you say scandinavia is three countries are you talking about finland or denmark being the third one

does anyone outside of a historian think denmark is apart of scandinavia

I know you're joking but I'm sure some idiot of going to come waltzing in thinking that Scandinavia is a communist hellhole
they'd be wrong to think that any first world country in europe is turning into that or is that

does anyone outside of a historian think denmark is apart of scandinavia
basically everyone in scandinavia?

does anyone outside of a historian think denmark is apart of scandinavia
denmark is by all definitions a part of scandinavia

does anyone outside of a historian think denmark is apart of scandinavia
yes
pretty much everyone because it is


denmark isnt even a name  it's two words put together


denmark is worse than swenmark

denmark is worse than icemark

denmark isnt even a name  it's two words put together
so is united states


It's funny that you would even remotely think that environmental upbringing changes the base identity of humanity. You literally cannot and will not get everyone to collectively agree with eachother for the greater good. If it were possible we would have moved passed this barrier by now.

It's funny that you would even remotely think that environmental upbringing changes the base identity of humanity.
It literally does. Society is built around the environmental factors and events surrounding it. Even on an individual scale, people's thoughts and ideas are influenced almost entirely by the environment they grow up in.

You literally cannot and will not get everyone to collectively agree with eachother for the greater good.
There's no such thing as 'greater good' because everyone will have their own biased opinion on what constitutes greater good. the best we can do is look how our actions objectively change the world around us and learn from that. A good example is to see that exploitation of workers leads to civil unrest, so in order to avoid civil unrest, you must not exploit workers

It literally does. Society is built around the environmental factors and events surrounding it. Even on an individual scale, people's thoughts and ideas are influenced almost entirely by the environment they grow up in.
There's no such thing as 'greater good' because everyone will have their own biased opinion on what constitutes greater good. the best we can do is look how our actions objectively change the world around us and learn from that. A good example is to see that exploitation of workers leads to civil unrest, so in order to avoid civil unrest, you must not exploit workers
yes but again, the definition of "exploitation" is relative as well. It's universally accepted, for example, that forcing young children to do hard labor is bad, but what about wage? I'm fine working for minimum wage, but other people are marching in the street demanding $15/hr. They believe their labor is worth more and they are being unfairly taken advantage of, but the employer-employee relationship is entirely consensual, which is why I don't believe that to be exploitation.

Pretty soon we're gonna have people saying working 8 hours or more a day is exploitation as well.