NORTH KOREA CONFLICT PREDICTION TOPIC

Author Topic: NORTH KOREA CONFLICT PREDICTION TOPIC  (Read 11563 times)

when you spew handicapped bullstuff on the daily it becomes hard for others to tell when you're being serious or just loving around
Gee, sure would be loving satisfying to me if a nuke collapsed and killed millions, AH LOOK AT THIS SADIST ERECTION!
forgetin' hell, who the hell would unironically loving like that stuff...

ALTHOUGH, if it were just Dennis Rodman's Pal and his government officials...

"steamroll" means send in all our stuff that isn't nukes (troops, tanks, etc.), if I wanted to nuke/bomb NK to dust I would've said "glass" NK

keep in mind i said we steamrolled iraq and i'm old enough to remember that we didn't nuke them

oh sorry i misunderstood

still steamrolling nk would result in heavy resistance. it would probably be better to undermine their operations and fund some sort of coup and then steamroll in, that way they're already pacified

No, it wouldn't. If we went into Iraq covertly and told the Ba'athists to overthrow Saddam Hussein, the country wouldn't be better as a result because the same dictatorial idealogues are still in power. If you want to make sure North Korea becomes a nice place to be, you have to rip out their entire government and start over.

It'd be easier if there was opposition in the government, but the Kims are pretty much infamous for having you executed if you even look at them funny. They're entirely uniform over there.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2017, 11:55:03 PM by Tactical Nuke »

Something I would like to see happen is the removal of dictatorship, but the preservation of socialism. Replace the dictator rationing resources across society (evidently unfairly) with the people democratically controlling it. The Communist mode of thinking has, in a way, already become commonplace, but it is is tainted by totalitarian propaganda. That I would like to see changed, but if we try to shoehorn capitalism into NK, we risk further destabilization.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2017, 12:02:17 AM by Karl Marx »

oh sorry i misunderstood

still steamrolling nk would result in heavy resistance. it would probably be better to undermine their operations and fund some sort of coup and then steamroll in, that way they're already pacified
While this is probably the ideal senario, time is of the essence. The USA has far and away the best defense against ballistic missles in THAAD, but not ICBMS. The NK military is far inferior to sadam's forces in the first gulf war, and the US is far superior in air power/capibility than the gulf war. Via air power alone North Korea could be rendered helpless in a matter of 3-4 hours. People often discount the importance of logistics in war, and this coupled with US forces in Korea along with the very potent SK and Japanese forces could quite literally shread NK in a matter of days. Also, a fact that is underreported is that DRK can only hit the northern most part of seol. Not the entire city. While civilian casualtys are obviously incredibly unideal, projected casualtys by the media is grossly overstated.

Something I would like to see happen is the removal of dictatorship, but the preservation of socialism. Replace the dictator rationing resources across society (evidently unfairly) with the people democratically controlling it. The Communist mode of thinking has, in a way, already become commonplace, but it is is tainted by totalitarian propaganda. If we try to shoehorn capitalism into NK, we risk further destabilization.
The fact you think the DPRK is socialist/communist is just another thing to add to the long list of "Why Karl Marx is a complete and total loving moron"

always good to underestimate your enemy
it was a joke. i was being rediculous on purpose...

Something I would like to see happen is the removal of dictatorship, but the preservation of socialism. Replace the dictator rationing resources across society (evidently unfairly) with the people democratically controlling it. The Communist mode of thinking has, in a way, already become commonplace, but it is is tainted by totalitarian propaganda. That I would like to see changed, but if we try to shoehorn capitalism into NK, we risk further destabilization.

the fact that you think people still buy your trolling is beyond me

The fact you think the DPRK is socialist/communist is just another thing to add to the long list of "Why Karl Marx is a complete and total loving moron"
I don't think they're communist, but I think their central planning system (bastardized socialism) can be reformed and turned into social planning, which is not only an improvement, but a more correct realization of socialism.

I don't think they're communist, but I think their central planning system (bastardized socialism) can be reformed and turned into social planning, which is not only an improvement, but a more correct realization of socialism.
As someone who took a class in college over east asian history the last 117 years, you have absolutly no loving idea what you're talking about



The Happenings - See You In September

Let them nuke Chicago, freeing me from this mortal coil


a year ago, everyone agreed that nk needs a leadership change by force.
obama dosent do stuff but cave in to kim's threats for more food/humanitarian bullstuff.

Annoying Orange may do what we should have done 20 years ago, libs suddenly like nk and lose their stuff.

remember that bill clinton gave them money and reactors, and basically allowed and helped them gain nuclear weapons. bush, obama, and almost hillary are all game to this.
a real president is now not putting up with the bullstuff.
« Last Edit: August 09, 2017, 02:12:40 AM by Bisjac »

a year ago, everyone agreed that nk needs a leadership change by force.

ah yes i remember when everyone agreed we need to invade north korea. remember that?