You do realize we pay for "utilities" as a convenience, right?
Take a good look at Hughes Net - they were one of the first scam artists to charge for extra data, and throttling speeds once you use it all, until you buy a 'restore token'. There is a grace period between 2AM and 8AM they call "off peak" hours which allows you to not use data during that time. A total stuff scam they use to rape more $ from the consumer
Repealing Net Neutrality lets companies like comcast deliver content such as NBC news on a higher priority than other news sites since it's an owned subsidiary. Furthermore, rival companies can now "limit access" to one-another. So in theory if Comcast doesn't like a "Comcast satanic ties" page by Info Wars they can block the viewing of said web page for all of their customers - effectively reducing the amount of internet freedom you have. How could you agree with such a thing?
Giving government control of broadband service through more stringent regulation wouldn't solve the problem of subpar service. It may solve price gouging, but that's quite an intrusive way to solve such a problem.
The only possible way that HughesNet could do that and not lose customers is if customers had no other option, which is hard to believe unless one lives in a VERY rural area. I personally know I live in a rural area and can pick from like 7 different ISPs. If my ISP started to pull that stuff, I'd switch providers. Problem solved.
If you honestly believe nationalizing broadband service would lead to better service at lower prices, you're sorely mistaken. Of course the market can't act properly in the case of a monopoly (your example of HughesNet's bullstuff), but giving government control over said monopoly doesn't make it any less stuffty. It may stop the stuffty price gouging, but there is no guarantee the service overall would be better or prices any lower, and HughesNet/Comcast are an extreme example of unethical practices.