Blockland became an echo chamber.

[Soljablock]

[02:40:55 A.M]Redo: hahahaha
[02:40:57 A.M]Johnny (^: specifically drawing cp is not as bad as being tribal is what I said
[02:41:01 A.M]Glass: WHAT
[02:41:10 A.M]Johnny (^: I'm not defending evar
[02:41:21 A.M]Johnny (^: I'm saying his bad is not as bad
[02:41:25 A.M]Freeday: how
[02:41:31 A.M]banana2: that
[02:41:36 A.M]banana2: is pretty much what you juts said

It also gets worse here too

[Ad Bot]

[Rigel]

(For people who don't know, evar678 was one of the people who got fired and banned from brickadia for drawing CP and then posting it on their twitter account, they also retweeted CP too)

I gotta ask, when you say "evar draws CP" do you mean he draws anime lolis, or depictions of real children?

[King Tøny]

He still gets mad whenever you bring that quote up.

Maybe he should stop defending child enthusiasts.

At least he's not tribal! 

[King Tøny]

do you mean he draws anime lolis, or depictions of real children?

it doesn't matter

[Soljablock]

I gotta ask, when you say "evar draws CP" do you mean he draws anime lolis, or depictions of real children?

It's still considered cp my guy also it's both

[Rigel]

it doesn't matter

I thought you were a staunch protector of freedom of speech, and therefore freedom of expression? Lewd drawings of real children is for sure a crime and should be punished if that's the case, but lolicon is just fiction and art. There's no victims in fictional works.

[mod-man]

I thought you were a staunch protector of freedom of speech, and therefore freedom of expression? Lewd drawings of real children is for sure a crime and should be punished if that's the case, but lolicon is just fiction and art. There's no victims in fictional works.

it is freedom of expression. and people are free to express how much of a child enthusiast you are for drawing it

[Rigel]

it is freedom of expression. and people are free to express how much of a child enthusiast you are for drawing it

Yeah fair, but there ought to be differentiation regardless. Because committing a crime is one thing, and making taboo art is another.

[Master Matthew²]

I thought you troons and troon allies

lol, lmao.

4chan slurs? I thought you were anti-Epstein.

[mod-man]

Yeah fair, but there ought to be differentiation regardless. Because committing a crime is one thing, and making taboo art is another.

yeah well if we lived in a perfect world where people were complex enough to synthesize whatever deep intrinsic thought provoking meaning there is behind drawing naked kids doing love stuff it could be that way, but we don't and the court of public opinion dictates the only reason you'd do that is for loveual gratification because that's the only reason they'd personally do it. legally there is a difference, but thats about as far as you're going to get in terms of fairness

[King Tøny]

lol, lmao.

4chan slurs? I thought you were anti-Epstein.

You troons made it a big deal.

It's just short for transloveual/mental illness would you prefer I said transmission?

[King Tøny]

but lolicon is just fiction and art. There's no victims in fictional works.

it doesn't matter

[King Tøny]

Yeah fair, but there ought to be differentiation regardless. Because committing a crime is one thing, and making taboo art is another.

I am not saying you are committing a crime by making taboo art.

However the public perception of child enthusiasm doesn't change even though it's fictional art.