-useless garble-
I could have worded it more politely you are right
In admitting that why did you continue on trying to defend your comments?
... .... just because I like somebody doesnt mean I cannot point out their flaws. If I had a freind who was fat I would not just automatically like every single feature. I would like some of his qualities over the others. I like you but you have an anger issue, or I like you but youre hair honestly looks ugly that color, pls dont hit me.
You like him and told us about his wonderful personality after your main comments on his appearance. So you wish to first make his flaws apparent then tell us how good of a friend he is?
Thats silly to be honest
Who is going to look at my opinion and make it theirs aswell, especially if they saw his image before my post and thought to themselves "wow he looks like a great guy" You obviously didnt, neither did ike. Just because I said something negative does not mean that every person who sees it will convert to my point of veiw.
You'd be surprised how a comment might change a person's perspective about another. That would be the tu quoque fallacy, try and avoid logical fallacies. They are pitfalls, but I will address what you said. I do not know the dear, so I have no reason to post anything negative about him nor anything positive. There is a different between throwing shade and not, in case you didn't know.
Of course every person wouldn't convert, nor did I say they would. Your public comment can influence and sway however.