theres the door, discussions have been slowly getting better anyways
I even wonder why I still visit this thread.
I'm always amazed at how people are incapable of following my logic. I'm not sure if it's through my own fault or theirs, but I and quite a few others seem to be able to follow it but as soon as someone tried to take an opposing side I'm suddenly speaking Russian in French to them. Two and two make four, how can you not understand that two and three make five? Are they incapable of understanding because they don't wish to? They can't see my points because of their limited views and frames of reference? Am I above or below? Mad or visionary?Perhaps it's the overall topic that they can't or do not wish to understand. I suppose loveual attraction to fictional characters can be hard to wrap a mind around, not even bringing into account their supposed relation to animals in our own realm. Is it fallacy on my part to want them to understand when they are incapable of it, or is it fallacy that I keep trying to help them understand?
You know I followed your logic completely, right?
wait hypothetical questionare bronies considered furries
It was more of a generalization than specifically you. If you followed it why didn't you just admit that people are different, enjoy different things, and that sentient things aren't animals?
Just because I follow your logic doesn't mean I agree with it
Logic is logic. Not following it is..well illogical.
the way they speak is aggravating
Logic is logic. Not following it is..well illogical. What could possibly make you choose something that has no endearing failures over something that(at this point in time) lacks any sort of failure?