Poll

battlefield 4

wowsers in my trousers
55 (37.9%)
bangarangzanga
17 (11.7%)
.
44 (30.3%)
awful
10 (6.9%)
wish it didnt exist
19 (13.1%)

Total Members Voted: 145

Author Topic: Battlefield Megathread  (Read 597362 times)

PCs are superior in every way!

There'll be more than enough console players hahaha. Don't choose PC just because you think it'll have more players.

Also Should I get this on the Ps3 or Pc.
I like the feel of having an actual controller but Pc will have more people.
adfgadgdf
PS3. Don't choose PC just if you want more people.

There'll be more than enough console players hahaha. Don't choose PC just because you think it'll have more players.
who would ever do that. PC is far superior just by the fact the PC was used to make consoles and their games.

pc 64 player. the way the real battlefield games were meant to be.
not that 24 player garbage lol.

you know they wont possibly let you console people use all, or the complete maps right? they are far to massive for a measly 24 people.

console gamers will never see the full game.

pc 64 player. the way the real battlefield games were meant to be.
not that 24 player garbage lol.

you know they wont possibly let you console people use all, or the complete maps right? they are far to massive for a measly 24 people.

console gamers will never see the full game.
Battlefield games were always meant to be on PC, but I'll just get it on console

who would ever do that.
Also Should I get this on the Ps3 or Pc.
I like the feel of having an actual controller but Pc will have more people.
adfgadgdf

herp. i do agree though, pc is better.

and wait, do you mean more players per game, shell? because yeah 64 player maps are the way its meant to be played.

herp. i do agree though, pc is better.

and wait, do you mean more players per game, shell? because yeah 64 player maps are the way its meant to be played.
And more options and stuffs. and takes more skill to be good. and yeah, 64 player maps

all the battlefield games have given half maps when the server only had like 16 players in it.
and of course if 48+ players, the map opens up to 2-3-4 times the size. and allowing access to all the bases, vehicles, and objectives.

the console versions will just have the small version of every map only. the super gimped one that is usually the pc demo map size.

smaller maps for consoles lol how will they handle things like jets then? how will they handle it at all the whole game seems way to complex and advanced for a console to even run. there looks to be so much stuff going on at once.

I'm an idiot for not being excited about a generic shooter.
Yep.



Take it to loving drama instead of spamming this thread.

If you don't like the game, stay out of the thread.

who could think bf3 is generic?

bf1942 and bf2 both reinvented the shooter genre each time. and now this is their 3rd. bringing tons of new technology and unique gameplay to the genre.

the battlefield games lead the entire genre.

who could think bf3 is generic?

bf1942 and bf2 both reinvented the shooter genre each time. and now this is their 3rd. bringing tons of new technology and unique gameplay to the genre.

the battlefield games lead the entire genre.
this

Medal of Honor 2010 has BF3 beta.

U jelly?

Medal of Honor 2010 has BF3 beta.

U jelly?
YEAUWEQHDFUEHFKEK YES I JELLY