Understanding Firearms =\/= Shameless Revival of Yuki's thread

[SpitFir3Tornado²]

Yes, if all the guns in call of duty were realistic they would be worse than the are in the game, rather than arcady action weapons. Misconceptions aren't even made by the media, it's just logical. Think about it, guns fire bullets. To for a gun to fire something you would need to put something in the gun. Logically you would put a bullet in the gun. It's like the toast in the toaster thing, where if someone has never seen a toaster they would assume you put toast in the toaster.

You just made no sense at all.

[Ad Bot]

[Daedalus]

Yes, if all the guns in call of duty were realistic they would be worse than the are in the game, rather than arcady action weapons.

no
see
here's how the media has twisted the facts and now you're spewing logical fallacies because that's how you've learned it
if the guns in call of duty were realistic, matches would be over in a minute, tops. the fact that you're able to take a sniper bullet to the chest without dying is loving beyond me, and for another thing, shotguns spread in a 180 degree arc and turn to cotton candy after six inches.
read the OP and come back to this discussion.

Misconceptions aren't even made by the media, it's just logical.

says the guy who thinks that call of duty weapons would be made worse if they were made realistic. k

Think about it, guns fire bullets. To for a gun to fire something you would need to put something in the gun. Logically you would put a bullet in the gun. It's like the toast in the toaster thing, where if someone has never seen a toaster they would assume you put toast in the toaster.

I have thought about it. Fred, I like you, but you really haven't quite thought about it yourself.
Let's break down your logic, because apparently you're going by names now:
TOASTer = put TOAST in
GUN = put GUN in
I'd like you to clarify, because I can't make heads or tails of what the forget you're trying to convey

[Headshot]

Could you add this to the poll please:

When people say the AK47/AKM fire the all might 7.62mm cartridge they also think that it also used the same round in the M14 and FN Fal. This is not the quite the case. As you can see the nato catridge is much bigger than the soviet catridge. It is also no bigger the 5.56mm.

Uh, the M14 fires the 7.62x51mm, Not the 7.62x54.

[fred da kiko]

no
see
here's how the media has twisted the facts and now you're spewing logical fallacies because that's how you've learned it
if the guns in call of duty were realistic, matches would be over in a minute, tops. the fact that you're able to take a sniper bullet to the chest without dying is loving beyond me, and for another thing, shotguns spread in a 180 degree arc and turn to cotton candy after six inches.

I was talking about guns, not the health. Snipers would have bullet drop, travel time, and wind. Bullets would have travel time, and shotguns would operate similar to how pistols do now, being mid range weapons rather than close range scatter guns. No quickscoping from across the map, one hit kill pistol shots, ect. It wouldn't be fun. if a sniper in real life worked like a cod sniper, it would be the best sniper in he world, seeing as all the guns in cod are raycasting laser guns.

read the OP and come back to this discussion

Mkay, i did. What's your point, misconceptions and ignorance, not laziness.

says the guy who thinks that call of duty weapons would be made worse if they were made realistic.

Bullet drop, raycasting, ect. Go play cod and compare a real sniper to a guaranteed headshot sniper.

Fred, I like you, but you really haven't quite thought about it yourself.
Let's break down your logic, because apparently you're going by names now:
TOASTer = put TOAST in
GUN = put GUN in
I'd like you to clarify, because I can't make heads or tails of what the forget you're trying to convey

nonononono. My logic is  as follows.

Bullet comes out of gun. Something must go in gun to come out. Bullet goes in gun.

Toast comes out of toaster. Something must go in toaster to come out. Toast goes in toaster.

It's logical to someone who has no actual knowledge of guns. The silencer, shotgun stuff is undoubtably media based, but they are grounded in reality. A shotgun blast will not go as far as a rifle, even with slugs, since it has no rifling, and a suppressor makes it difficult to pinpoint someone's location, so to someone who knows nothing about suppressors they would assume that meant it dampened the gunshot.

[TheChaosCarrier]

I think fred listens to the media too often.

[fred da kiko]

I think fred listens to the media too often.

Oh yea, totally. I was watching Fox news yesterday and they were talking about how .233 Remington and 5.56 NATO rounds are the same and Justin Beiber's new haircut. Really interesting stuff.

[TheChaosCarrier]

Because the media ONLY involves news broadcast networks.

[fred da kiko]

Oh yea, totally. I was watching Fox news ICarly yesterday and they were talking about how .233 Remington and 5.56 NATO rounds are the same and Justin Beiber's new haircut. Really interesting stuff.

[TheChaosCarrier]

Completely missing the point, but okay.

[fred da kiko]

Oh yea, totally. I was watchingFox news yesterday and they were talking about how .233 Remington and 5.56 NATO rounds are the same and Justin Beiber's new haircut. Really interesting stuff. playing CoD and they were putting toast in a toaster

[TheChaosCarrier]

Swing and a miss.
Idiocy knows no bounds, it seems.

[fred da kiko]

Swing and a miss.
Idiocy knows no bounds, it seems.

You miss my point completely, I know stuff about guns, the difference is that I'm not a twat about it.

[TheChaosCarrier]

And you miss the point that the Media does slander just about everything. It is ignorance and misconception that gun-control enthusiast are fueled by.

Also, toast does not go in a toaster. Bread does.
Toast comes out of the toaster after the bread is done toasting.

If you put toast in a toaster, then I guess you're quite fond of pitch-black, burnt crisps that were once toast.

[SpitFir3Tornado²]

Slice of bread goes in a toaster, toast comes out.
Cartridge goes into gun, bullet comes out.

Your logic still is not logical.

[fred da kiko]

Slice of bread goes in a toaster, toast comes out.
Cartridge goes into gun, bullet comes out.

Your logic still is not logical.

You know that because you have knowledge of both of these, someone who only knows toast comes out of the toaster would assume toast goes in, same with the bullet and the gun. If you put a cannonball in a cannon, the cannonball comes out, if you put a bolt on a crossbow, the crossbow fires a bolt. It's an easy misconception if nobody has ever given you the information about bullets and cartridges.

And you miss the point that the Media does slander just about everything. It is ignorance and misconception that gun-control enthusiast are fueled by.

Also, toast does not go in a toaster. Bread does.
Toast comes out of the toaster after the bread is done toasting.

If you put toast in a toaster, then I guess you're quite fond of pitch-black, burnt crisps that were once toast.

That's the loving brown townogy. Someone who only knows that toast comes out of a toaster would assume toast goes in. Of course, like a person who doesn't know that a bullet is the tip of the cartelage, that person would not know that toast is basically slightly over cooked bread.