Poll

What is your main sona?

House Cat
71 (7.7%)
Big Cat
25 (2.7%)
General Dog
24 (2.6%)
Wolf
68 (7.3%)
Fox
92 (9.9%)
Snake
5 (0.5%)
Naga
4 (0.4%)
Lizard
8 (0.9%)
Dragon
55 (5.9%)
Horse
5 (0.5%)
Deer
6 (0.6%)
General Bird
17 (1.8%)
Gryphon
11 (1.2%)
Bat
5 (0.5%)
Otter
10 (1.1%)
Rabbit
7 (0.8%)
Frog
3 (0.3%)
Shark
16 (1.7%)
Whale
7 (0.8%)
Raptor
8 (0.9%)
Owl
8 (0.9%)
Goo Creature
22 (2.4%)
Rubber Creature
3 (0.3%)
Latex Creature
31 (3.3%)
Bear
14 (1.5%)
Weasel
3 (0.3%)
Ferret
10 (1.1%)
Sergal
7 (0.8%)
Camel
12 (1.3%)
DeadFur
18 (1.9%)
Human
352 (38%)

Total Members Voted: 923

Author Topic: Furry Megathread - Furry Things Here  (Read 5224275 times)


hi flatflyer random burd
I got a picture from the same artist with the same flatflyer bird.


I'm making an art as we type, I'm remaking that Kingdom Hearts stained glass piece I made last year.

if they look like a child then yes it is wrong
Dude..

I don't even



THIS MAKES NO SENSE
« Last Edit: August 23, 2014, 06:47:52 PM by Brickitect »

now that's an adorable night fury

why does he have a cross made of bumps on his forehead though

now that's an adorable night fury

why does he have a cross made of bumps on his forehead though
Idk I just doodled that there when making the ref sheet and it stuck.

Dude..
I don't even
THIS MAKES NO SENSE
how does it not make sense? he's saying it'd be creepy if your date looked like a child and you didn't.

« Last Edit: August 23, 2014, 07:16:13 PM by Jubel »

why does he have a cross made of bumps on his forehead though
cus he's ultra pious
Dude..
I don't even
THIS MAKES NO SENSE
cus it means you're attracted to someone that looks like a little kid?

still isn't relevant? heck, nightfox even said why
and you still missed the point
You said the character looked young, I said it's bound to happen when you have a culture obsessed with youth, then provided a link to clarify what I meant.
That's not irrelevant

what i'm trying to say is that regardless of a person's actual age, people are still going to find it at least a bit creepy if they see someone who looks like a 25-year old having loveual relations with someone who looks like a 16-year-old. somehow you missed this entire thing and went off on a tirade about how the appearance doesn't even matter, when in this context appearance is the entire reason nightfox said anything about it
There's plenty of people who don't see a problem with potential age differences, or even real differences.
If you do, then go ahead and think that, if you don't like things cuz they look too young, go ahead. But I don't think that way,  (at least not with imaginary creatures, humans are different)
Now, people could have just said "eh, looks too young for me" but instead they went "WOW THAT'S A BABY THAT'S CREEPY YOU'RE A child enthusiast"
« Last Edit: August 23, 2014, 07:42:59 PM by Headcrab Zombie »

but instead they went "WOW THAT'S A BABY THAT'S CREEPY YOU'RE A child enthusiast"
weren't you just saying something to me about a strawman earlier? nobody said that. for that matter, as far as I can tell, everyone was just playing with you. I know I was. but then you got all offended

weren't you just saying something to me about a strawman earlier? nobody said that. for that matter, as far as I can tell, everyone was just playing with you. I know I was. but then you got all offended
The quote was a compilation of three posts that I paraphrased: you said child (close enough to baby), Steve said sicko (close enough to creepy), Mr man posted Chris Hansen, which is pretty much saying "you're a creep"
And if you were joking, maybe you should have said so after the first post?

And if you were joking, maybe you should have said so after the first post?
cus you said stuff that was wrong contextually not 100% correct

You said the character looked young, I said it's bound to happen when you have a culture obsessed with youth, then provided a link to clarify what I meant.
That's not irrelevant
okay i'm pretty sure the point i was trying to make is in like china right now because you keep missing it. some lgbt groups =/= everyone, and i doubt i speak for everyone either but jesus christ man

There's plenty of people who don't see a problem with percipience age differences, or even real differences.
If you do, then go ahead and think that, if you don't like things cuz they look too young, go ahead. But I don't think that way,  (at least not with imaginary creatures, humans are different)
Now, people could have just said "eh, looks too young for me" but instead they went "WOW THAT'S A BABY THAT'S CREEPY YOU'RE A child enthusiast"


this is like the exact opposite of the point i was trying to make. sure not everyone sees it as wrong but plenty of people also do. why the forget are you even arguing about this anymore, it's just your word against mine. also

for that matter, as far as I can tell, everyone was just playing with you. I know I was. but then you got all offended
this (only the bolded part though)
i honestly don't understand why you're so offended at someone expressing distaste towards someone's response to a character. just take what nightfox said with a grain of salt, you don't need to attempt to defend yourself because anyone who's at least competent will probably assume that's not what you meant and/or people were looking with the wrong context.

Yeah, I was joking too. I think mine should've been obvious because, well, it's me.
What if a five year old was cryagenically frozen for 13 years and is legally 18, and then we have hot steamy love. It's still a creepphilic thing to do. I'd have to be a child enthusiast to be attracted to her.

Oh, and remember that image that was posted a week or two ago of an underage furry girl drawn in a lewd way? Same deal. Don't matter that the artist says they're 21. What's drawn is clearly a child.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2014, 07:39:33 PM by Steve5451² »

What if a five year old was cryagenically frozen for 13 years and is legally 18, and then we have hot steamy love. It's still a creepphilic thing to do. I'd have to be a child enthusiast to be attracted to her.

Oh, and remember that image that was posted a week or two ago of an underage furry girl drawn in a lewd way? Same deal. Don't matter that the artist says they're 21. What's drawn is clearly a child.
thank you.

cus you said stuff that was wrong contextually not 100% correct
Such as?

why the forget are you even arguing about this anymore.
What the forget are you talking about
I just said basically "OK you like what you want and I'll like what I want"

i honestly don't understand why you're so offended at someone expressing distaste towards someone's response to a character.
They didn't, they said things about me
"WOW THAT'S A BABY THAT'S CREEPY YOU'RE A child enthusiast"

Yeah, I was joking too. I think mine should've been obvious because, well, it's me.
I knew you were joking after
Trust me, I know.

>mfw this discussion is still going on