Ok, but most people agreed with him on this point. If you call him hypocritical, you would call everyone else who agrees with him on this topic hypocrites. I honestly think if some with a bad reputation that posts a good point that other people agree on, they should be given a chance.
They agreed with his points in general. And no I wouldn't call anyone who agrees with him a hypocrite because they don't have a horrid reputation, hint hint, what I've been saying so far.
And no, they shouldn't be given a chance if they constantly stuff around for whatever reason that makes their reputation even lower. Seriously, 2 weeks ago, like Badspot said, he was banned for breaking the rules on purpose because he wanted to share his hate speech with us before he 'leaves.'
Maybe if it was a month or two ago, sure, things can be forgiven to a point, but not two weeks in the ban and we already have a hypocritical drama on how he sees the community as 'dysfunctional.' I don't see why you're bothering with defending him. He was given too many chances already and still doesn't clear up after any of them.
Seriously read my reply because it looks like you either read the first sentence or skimmed through it. It explains his comfort level logic on this forum. Besides after you defend him, what's he going to do for you? Probably nothing and later even laugh at you for doing something stupid in his eyes or something.
Think harder on this, seriously. He will be back to himself after 'all is forgiven' or the community forgets about him and he will be brought up to attention again, then do an "apology", then "leave" with a hate speech, then make another "apology" upon returning from "leaving" then repeat, without rinsing.