Zoe Quinn, and what being in bed with writers will do to the games industry.

Author Topic: Zoe Quinn, and what being in bed with writers will do to the games industry.  (Read 21897 times)


Imagine if she was on her period. Christ, that'd be ugly.



How about we lure the feminational socialists into attacking us , making us the victims and the matyrs. The media would eat it up and make the feminational socialist bastards look like the bad girls.


We can't attack them, they always pull the stupid martydrom bullstuff every single time.

Got a few lines in, saw he brought up "MRAS" even though they have literally nothing to do with Quinn.
Someone else tell me if I should even bother reading?
Yeah of course. If you are going to stop reading after one word than you are loving stupid, especially since he said SJW very near to that lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NqU4_k4wrQ&feature=youtu.be

you can hear her fake laugh choking back tears thing at about 1:40

also you guys know she admitted to like
raping a guy right

late whoops

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Km3DZQp0StE

Bump. InternetAristocrat's third video on the subject. He's very much focused specifically on the media ("journalists") as usual.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NqU4_k4wrQ&feature=youtu.be

you can hear her fake laugh choking back tears thing at about 1:40

also you guys know she admitted to like
raping a guy right

late whoops
"I'm in a room with like 5 other people" (gettin some more burgers n fries?)

Gobdam Zoe how much more of a slut can you be?

Also jeez what a bitch she is in this video holy crap.

Bump. InternetAristocrat's third video on the subject. He's very much focused specifically on the media ("journalists") as usual.
Which is good.
Instead of getting all butthurt over a girls lovelife he's focusing on the greater issue.

Also jeez what a bitch she is in this video holy crap.
Yeah she's not a pleasant person.

HOLY stuff #GamerGate is the greatest forget fest on the internet since like

I don't even know

HOLY stuff #GamerGate is the greatest forget fest on the internet since like

I don't even know

Ironically the first InternetAristocrat video posted is one of the best examples of shoddy journalism I've ever seen.

You know what grinds my gears?

When I went through the GamerGate hashtag, there were so many loving handicapped morons who were only doing it because they apparently "hate indie games". loving Christ.

Then I found this image from a clear forgettard, if he/she is a dev.



Apparently this is an Anon game dev who says that indies are "scared"to talk about this, and that apparently just because Anita has an opinion and Fez had some unique mechanics, they should have been ineligible for their various awards. If they're not some jealous moron making FPS games that have no unique or original qualities, I'll be surprised.

I'm part of an IGDA group, and I've been part of the discussions about this issue. The thing devs are most scared of has nothing to do with SJWs or media. They're entirely focused on death threats and all the new forms of online abuse that are a result of this kind of controversy. That's what most of them care about, because they're intelligent enough to recognise that everybody can and should be allowed to make the games they want, and even though they should be critiqued, we need to have a level of respect higher than loving primal.

If a majority of gamers are going to act like little cry-babies because somebody made a game they probably haven't played and won't ever play, and because a woman came and made some videos about why she doesn't like games, unless they man the forget up, actually engage with the content and then make a serious review about why they don't like it without resorting to moronic death/rape threats, they should have no right to own any form of communication whatsoever, and we should lock them away forever.

IF YOU WANT YOUR GAMES TO BE CONSIDERED AN ART FORM, THEN ACTUALLY TREAT EVERY loving DEVELOPER WITH AN OUNCE OF RESPECT, AND STOP INSISTING THAT ALL GAMES HAVE TO BE TWITCH SHOOTERS.

Ironically the first InternetAristocrat video posted is one of the best examples of shoddy journalism I've ever seen.
Expounding on my point here.
Quote
Look at his videos again.
He claims many many things without backing almost none of them.
Claim A: Zoe slept with Phil Fish's partner. Phil Fish defended Zoe. There is a clear connection.
First of all, the ONLY 'evidence' that Zoe slept with Phil Fish's partner is from her ex-boyfriend's blog. Ex-boyfriend's blog is NOT a credible source for any level of journalism. This is a level of TMZ. Even if Zoe slept with Phil Fish's partner, how can she influence Phil Fish to do her bidding? It doesn't help InternetAristocrat's credibility when he screams 'I am not afraid of you Phil Fish! You are one hit star!' [Wow such professionalism].
Claim B: Zoe slept with Nathan Grayson. Nathan Grayson put Zoe on her positive light with his articles.
Again, the only evidence that Zoe slept with Nathan Grayson at all was her Ex-boyfriend's blog when the video was posted. But wait! Nathan Grayson admitted that he had relationship with Zoe! [Which doesn't mean that using Ex-blog as only source is professional journalism, but let's move on] Sure, but his more important claim isn't still backed up.
What articles did Nathan Grayson write about Zoe? He must have mentioned her name and Depression Quest multiple times! Actually no. The alleged time point of the relationship is around May or June. He didn't write a single article mentioning Zoe or her game in Kotaku EXCEPT on March, the article about the GAME JAM.
The ONLY article he wrote is 2 months before the alleged time point of the relationship. InternetAristocrat cries conflict of interest . . on an article written 2 months before the alleged time point of the relationship . .
Claim C: Kotaku internal investigation?
I guess it wasn't actually a claim. He just casts 'doubt' on the investigation. Do you know why he casts doubt on the investigation? Because he can't pin point to anything definitive to confirm his belief!