I've 100% had it with these loving islam asylum seekers

[Rally]

why would I have answered it? it isn't a genuine question. you're only asking it to be a richardhead. like I said before, those feelings of mine only apply to banning guns and other related things (e.g. getting rid of militaries). and like I also said, that's why I don't bother arguing about those things (naturally everyone ignored that part though and tried to argue about it anyway)

I had to make sure 'refugees' didn't fit in somewhere between 'gun control' and 'violence' and now 'disbanding the military (the forget?)'. It's not exactly an outlandish expectation of you at this point. I had to ask because I couldn't think of another logical reason why somebody would blatantly disregard 11 sources in favor of some Illuminati conspiracy SJW bullstuff. Also you were arguing about gun control in the previous thread so it comes to me as no surprise that you got blown off for that obviously inaccurate claim.

It's funny, really, that people are fleeing from starfishs only to end up surrounded by starfishs.

Forcing the locals to cough up extra money to make refugees more comfy doesn't exactly sound starfish legislature to me. At-least, not for one side.

[Ad Bot]

[TheArmyGuy]

why don't you join a neo national socialist club I hear they're starting those back up in Germany

that way you can be mad at brown people all you want but it's okay this time.

It's funny because the asylum seekers where I live are mainly housed in an old but maintained ww2 national socialist forward base.

EDIT: I should also note that while the largest part of the asylum seekers is muslims, there's also some Asians. They're totally fine. They ask for directions very politely in good English or sometimes even try in Dutch. It's not asylum seekers that bother me, it's the culture most of them bring along.
If your culture results in a giant war zone in your area of origine, please don't bring it to mine.

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

It's funny because the asylum seekers where I live are mainly housed in an old but maintained ww2 national socialist forward base.

do the "showers" still work

EDIT: I should also note that while the largest part of the asylum seekers is muslims, there's also some Asians. They're totally fine. They ask for directions very politely in good English or sometimes even try in Dutch. It's not asylum seekers that bother me, it's the culture most of them bring along.
If your culture results in a giant war zone in your area of origine, please don't bring it to mine.

hey
asian and muslim arent mutually exclusive terms

[Frequency]

uggh ur just islamophobic >:(!!!!!!!!!!!!

[CRITAWAKETS]

TheArmyGuy,i suggest you move to somewhere like america. They wont go to freaking america. And you could always go without any of them at all with colonizing your own island.

[IkeTheGeneric]

Why should everyone else have to bend over backwards for them when the hard majority refuse to integrate into society? It's clear that they come from a backwards, war-torn country, but immigration shouldn't have to change everyone's way of life if the migrants don't like where they're living.

[sir dooble]

this is why i did say beforehand
i meant 'why didn't they do this before letting them in'
because the way it's been handled so far in countries that are accepting refugees, it's just a mass grab for brownie(ha) points.

How could we do that?
They just started landing all of a sudden on the shores of Greece, and walking into Europe via Turkey.
It's a mass exodus.

We can't force Turkey or Syria to stop them where they are before we process them, because they're not part of the EU (and in the case of Syria, obviously don't have control of their country).

We can't just let them all stay where they land, because they would overrun nations like Greece, Macedonia, Bulgaria, etc...
So, the larger western nations start taking them in.

But the refugees were moving anyway. Europe has an open-border policy with all EU nations. Once they've landed in Greece they can walk their way through to Germany.
Greece, Croatia, Bosnia, they don't have the means to stop that many people.
Before you know it there are refugees on your doorstep in France, Germany, Britain, Sweden, etc...

There was never a chance to stop and educate the refugees.

[Foxscotch]

I had to make sure 'refugees' didn't fit in somewhere between 'gun control' and 'violence' and now 'disbanding the military (the forget?)'.

specifically, banning guns. or banning militaries. I can't really think of any other examples. my desire to be rid of these things requires a world where people are not obsessed with violence

I had to ask because I couldn't think of another logical reason why somebody would blatantly disregard 11 sources in favor of some Illuminati conspiracy SJW bullstuff.

how is the idea that news companies like to get readers anything like a conspiracy? newspapers probably printed all kinds of made up tribal stuff when segregation was legal

Also you were arguing about gun control in the previous thread

news to me

[AutoBahn]

on the subject of immigrants getting into Europe undocumented and that there's no way to really stop them, the UN's attempts at stopping illegal immigration from Africa can actually be a very vital point to look at. Take this map of EU joint patrols filtering immigration from Africa into Europe:

It's not preposterous to say that similar patrols couldn't be set up to filter refugees

[IkeTheGeneric]

my desire to be rid of these things requires a world where people are not obsessed with violence

Are people obsessed with violence enough for it to be a prevalent issue in modern society? I had always assumed that this rhetoric was used at a political scapegoat when more complex issues need to be addressed.

[Foxscotch]

Are people obsessed with violence enough for it to be a prevalent issue in modern society?

the US spends a ridiculous amount of money every year on weapons and soldiers it doesn't need, and just got out of a war that doesn't seem to have had any real purpose
not to mention terrorist attacks and public shootings, of which there have been many lately
and the fact that the idea of killing someone for revenge (capital punishment) is considered acceptable by the general public
etc.

also worth mentioning again the first sentence in this thread's OP

these feelings have nothing to do with other issues, it is solely because I don't like death. it's just unpleasant

[Twerky]

Get us some sources of the redundant spending for your safety pls
Or is this Tumblr speaking

[Rally]

how is the idea that news companies like to get readers anything like a conspiracy?

If newspaper companies just printed whatever the hell they wanted with no solid foundation for the sole purpose of getting readers, what's stopping them from printing articles about unicorn bones and aliens (note: extreme example)? If TAG posted a bunch of articles from republican-news.org I might side with you, but he didn't, he posted sources from local Netherlands print which has been around since before you and I were even born. We're not dealing with click-bait and dial up here.

a world where people are not obsessed with violence

Yeah, sounds like a damn great place to live buddy. I'd much rather the USA spend billions of dollars on cool spaceships rather than blowing up delusional jihadists in Iraq. It's not the reality though, and this fantasy world you've conjured up doesn't include refugees which basically confirms your bias towards them, which is why I asked whether or not your fantasy world was part of this equation.

[fireking]

Are people obsessed with violence enough for it to be a prevalent issue in modern society?

uh, yes. especially in the US

[IkeTheGeneric]

the US spends a ridiculous amount of money every year on weapons and soldiers it doesn't need, and just got out of a war that doesn't seem to have had any real purpose

Our country prides itself in it's military, it's more of a "Who's got a bigger richard" thing rather than a drive for violence. With that said, do you mean weapons and soldiers it doesn't need as in military is unnecessary or that the size of our military is unnecessary?

not to mention terrorist attacks and public shootings, of which there have been many lately

The only thing separating a terrorist attack from a random mass act of violence is the political objective behind the violence. In the case of terrorism, it's usually because of a deeper, more complex reason beyond an obsession with violence.

Random acts of violence have happened often enough for it to cause some concern, but as far as I know mass shootings were pretty much on the down low before this terrorism stuff

and the fact that the idea of killing someone for revenge (capital punishment) is considered acceptable by the general public

In the US, I believe a majority are against capital punishment. I'll have to look it up again but I'm fairly sure most people either oppose the death penalty or don't have an opinion.

these feelings have nothing to do with other issues, it is solely because I don't like death. it's just unpleasant

Death is a part of life. It's going to happen regardless of any factor. I'm in the same boat as you if you mean you don't like murder. People shouldn't have to kill other people.