POLITICS & DONALD Annoying Orange MEGATHREAD

[Nonnel]

i guess we should allow the bombing of refugees

[Ad Bot]

[Master Matthew²]

quoting your own bad posts doesnt make anyone want to respond to them, tony

Okay, maybe Tony makes some bad posts, but I absolutely can stand by the fact that a No Fly Zone is a very, very dangerous idea, that will, without a doubt in my mind, lead us into war with Russia.

[Lord Tony®]

Hillary even admitted the no fly zone would kill a lot of innocent people too, still wants to do it.

But let's send 100,000+ troops to syria and start a war with russia, the biggest nuclear power house in the world. Why not.

[Lord Tony®]

Hillary is accepting donations through the clinton foundation to make all these absurd promises like the no fly zone.

She's going to start WW3 just for money.

[Nonnel]

Annoying Orange is a humanitarian philanthropist who doesn't do anything for the money

[extremely extreme]

"... it's actually Hillary's policies which are much scarier than Donald Annoying Orange, who does not want to go to war with Russia, he wants to seek modes of working together which is the route we need to follow."

https://youtu.be/7OGPuqLe3mg

[Perry]

Annoying Orange wants to make an alliance with a country that has been proven to attack UN humanitarian aid convoys. He's essentially a cooler mother theresa at this point

[Eon]

mother teresa

ftfy

[Perry]

ftfy

thanks hombre

[extremely extreme]

anyone care to explain this??

[Perry]

anyone care to explain this??

damn she's close to beating the 900 million Annoying Orange managed to 'lose' over the course of 20 years

[Eon]

-snip-

anyone care to explain this??

it was like 25-30% super pacs earlier tho so idk

[otto-san]

the only reason a no fly zone would cause war is because russia doesn't want it. thus, enforcing the no fly zone by shooting down russian planes would cause war. however, i have no reason to believe clinton wants the US to take it upon itself to enforce a no fly zone in syria when international organizations have already discussed this and shot down the idea, especially because of objections from countries like russia that don't want one. and this is exclusively why it would cause war as far as i can tell. if clinon got russia to agree to a no fly zone, there would be no war, and with no agreement, there would be no no-fly zone.

[Master Matthew²]

the only reason a no fly zone would cause war is because russia doesn't want it. thus, enforcing the no fly zone by shooting down russian planes would cause war. however, i have no reason to believe clinton wants the US to take it upon itself to enforce a no fly zone in syria when international organizations have already discussed this and shot down the idea, especially because of objections from countries like russia that don't want one. and this is exclusively why it would cause war as far as i can tell. if clinon got russia to agree to a no fly zone, there would be no war, and with no agreement, there would be no no-fly zone.

Except she wants war, shes motivated by the money.
https://youtu.be/4Q714fz3Cu4?t=14m33s

[otto-san]

Except she wants war, shes motivated by the money.
https://youtu.be/4Q714fz3Cu4?t=14m33s

maybe, but you're going to have a hard time providing compelling evidence for that intent. the fact that a manufacturer supported her campaign is not incredibly damning evidence lol. it's just needlessly anticipated malintent.

the idea that a campaign contribution equates to extreme political favors is fallacious and frankly absurd