Maxx: A Case Study on BLF's Worst User

Author Topic: Maxx: A Case Study on BLF's Worst User  (Read 43765 times)

lol I don't have any reason to waste my time arguing with people who don't listen to reason and have convoluted ideas of how they think networking infrastructures work

bye
instead of giving up for no good reason prove your point
tapping out right now is a real pusillanimous individual move

also as i have said numerous loving times
i am not the person who spammed the cytube
i dont care about his cytube
i dont care about zealot

anyone can have an ip of "73.74.XX.XX", just because one ip on there matches me by 4 digits doesn't mean its directly me
reference: http://www.check-my-ip.net/all-ip-addresses/73.74
(yes i will keep using this because this is valid in every way possible)

the guy on xbox is not streaming
his ip's aren't expired
he has ports closed
you understand that certain ports have to be open in order to communicate with networks, right? in an xbox 360s case, certain ports would have to be open in order to communicate with xbox live servers.

instead of giving up for no good reason prove your point
tapping out right now is a real pusillanimous individual move

the code of internet honor means you are forced to spoon feed information which is easily accessible to anyone with a computer to people who haven't backed up their claims with anything beyond a 2 second youtube clip

or you're like, a pusillanimous individual, or something

>networking statistics



uhm? isn't that what we are arguing over? network connections between maxx and boss battles and whether or not making them public is dangerous? which I am 100% sure it isn't. I guess you guys can have my IP since they literally don't let you do anything



\
oh so instead of trying to use any logic to prove me wrong or explain why you're right you would rather just walk away because its a "waste of time"
okay
it is a waste of time. he didn't post a drama and i dont think he's obligated to spend time refuting something

oh my god theres a guy literally recording himself getting ddosed offline on xbox
please post this video because I'm pretty sure it doesn't exist

the code of internet honor means you are forced to spoon feed information which is easily accessible to anyone with a computer to people who haven't backed up their claims with anything beyond a 2 second youtube clip

or you're like, a pusillanimous individual, or something
the point is that if he's the master of all networking, then why can't he just easily spout out the information that would end the argument
there's no reason not to take <5 minutes to do so and save a lot of effort for everyone else in the thread

uhm? isn't that what we are arguing over? network connections between maxx and boss battles and whether or not making them public is dangerous? which I am 100% sure it isn't. I guess you guys can have my IP since they literally don't let you do anything


it is a waste of time. he didn't post a drama and i dont think he's obligated to spend time refuting something
please post this video because I'm pretty sure it doesn't exist
you have to be trolling
https://youtu.be/KYFuvyLJx_c?t=2m2s
https://youtu.be/KYFuvyLJx_c?t=2m2s
https://youtu.be/KYFuvyLJx_c?t=2m2s
https://youtu.be/KYFuvyLJx_c?t=2m2s
https://youtu.be/KYFuvyLJx_c?t=2m2s
he is hit offline multiple times, aswell as his friend being hit offline

I love contributing to build a ball a cancer. When I was young I asked my dad if I could be cancer when I grow up. nothing happened after that, so I gave up.

he just easily spout out the information that would end the argument

she literally did. you can't communicate with someone on a network when their ports are closed

some people can't seem to wrap their head around the idea that 'being offline on xbox' doesn't mean you're not still communicating with microsoft servers

https://youtu.be/KYFuvyLJx_c?t=2m2s
okay I don't really know what a random 6 minute youtube video is gonna prove. unless that dude was hosting a server, he literally couldn't have been ddosed. this isn't complex. without opened ports you literally cannot take in traffic that would act as a ddos.

okay I don't really know what a random 6 minute youtube video is gonna prove. unless that dude was hosting a server, he literally couldn't have been ddosed. this isn't complex. without opened ports you literally cannot take in traffic that would act as a ddos.
yet this video proves that hes dos'd
you're trolling at this point

okay I don't really know what a random 6 minute youtube video is gonna prove. unless that dude was hosting a server, he literally couldn't have been ddosed. this isn't complex. without opened ports you literally cannot take in traffic that would act as a ddos.

http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/48302/can-you-be-ddosed-even-if-you-are-behind-a-home-router-with-no-open-ports

yet this video proves that hes dos'd
you're trolling at this point
WTF dude are you for real. it is literally impossible to be ddosed with closed ports.

but if you are go goddamn scared of the DDOS boogeyman, go change your network IP. It isn't hard.

WTF dude are you for real. it is literally impossible to be ddosed with closed ports.

but if you are go goddamn scared of the DDOS boogeyman, go change your network IP. It isn't hard.
already explained that xfinity controls the ips and i can't do anything about it but you really don't read my posts
guess you ran out of claims so now you don't know what to say?

I'm not going to comment on any of the actual drama; I just want to clarify a fact.

You can't dos someone who isn't hosting something, and if someone is hosting something you already have their ip
DoS stands for "Denial of Service", and it's a form of attack where garbage data is spammed to a target "server", in the hopes that the garbage will interrupt and suspend networking services for the target either by crashing or simply flooding the network devices on the target-side.

DoS attacks can be performed against anybody who is connected to the Internet, regardless of if they're acting as a web-server or as just a client, so long as you have access to their IP address, as that allows you to directly communicate with their networking equipment. There are, in fact, many web-services which you can pay to flood a specific IP address, which should usually be a server but could just be an individual's computer.

There's no difference between a device acting as a server and a device acting as a client in terms of IP, outside of the fact that most web-servers use static IPs while most clients/users have dynamic IPs, but technically you can ask your ISP to switch your account type at any time.