Is there any perfect evidence that proves FairFax = Cca? If not, this drama shouldn't have been made until legit proof is provided. Even if cca is known for his manipulative behavior, it is not legitimate in my eyes to jump to quick conclusions or even threat someone with drama (and claim that this specific person is an alt of some other person who is known for his stupid acts) while there is actually no evidence, I repeat: no evidence. I'm surprised this topic actually gets support, because the quality of this topic is pretty much the quality of an average drama topic, that backfired right at the moment ProTear posted the pictures.
All I see here is a paranoid OP that sees cca in some person because of wild speculation and shaky indices, and tries to get a possible innocent victim banned. I have lots of friends that post ":)" at the end of a phrase when they show off some cool things, it's also not unusual that some people have a similar chatting behavior. Are they cca now? Don't get me wrong. I definitely support the revoke on sight for manipulative persons who had several chances and never used them for good, but I'm not supporting revoke (on sight) for innocent people. If evidence is provided, I will most likely change my mind on this.