[NEWS] Colorado's investment in birth control reduces teen births by 50%

Author Topic: [NEWS] Colorado's investment in birth control reduces teen births by 50%  (Read 13177 times)

beachbum becomes an ancap so he can lose an argument

Poor people are still starving even though we have welfare path

Society is one for all and all for one. This is how: ecosystems, animal bodies, organs, cells, countries, families, everything works.

What you're proposing beachbum is every man for himself, which is essentially pre-neolithic earth.

Poor people are still starving even though we have welfare path
Homeless people are starving. The majority of poor people are able to afford cheap food, such as arizona, mcdonalds and other food items, partially because of welfare. A lot of poor people also work and receive welfare to support their family. Homeless people, who are usually not even eligible for welfare, are starving

This doesn't mean that being poor is a good thing. It just means that most people below the poverty line are able to keep themselves alive on a day to day basis, thanks to mere pennies from everyone else in the country

when you're in poverty really the only food items you can afford is off brand bargain bin stuff from the store and mcdonalds dollar menu

So you ate vegetables for your entire life?

Poor people pay taxes too. If poor people didn't exist, your public education and transportation would probably cost thousands of dollars to use. Even though Lance refuses to work, he still pays taxes. There are millions of other poor people who aren't even on welfare and work their asses off and still pay taxes too.

Again: The amount he pays in taxes doesn't make up for the amount we give him, he leaves us in a deficit of money that would be better spent elsewhere. I don't understand what part of this you can't wrap your head around

the elderly and the poor are WEAK and must be left to FADE OUT OF EXISTENCE
its a very eugenicist point of view

might as well cull the weak with survival-of-the-fittest things

...

which is tempting but i digress

Again: The amount he pays in taxes doesn't make up for the amount we give him, he leaves us in a deficit of money that would be better spent elsewhere. I don't understand what part of this you can't wrap your head around
so you genuinely just think the solution to poverty is to let them starve to death?

Society is one for all and all for one. This is how: ecosystems, animal bodies, organs, cells, countries, families, everything works.

What you're proposing beachbum is every man for himself, which is essentially pre-neolithic earth.

What if you don't want to pay for a guy in Vermont to buy McDonalds?

when you're in poverty really the only food items you can afford is off brand bargain bin stuff from the store and mcdonalds dollar menu

Is that why poor people are fat

so you genuinely just think the solution to poverty is to let them starve to death?
soon the poor will have nothing left to eat but the rich

theres a chance they'll riot and stuff

Again: The amount he pays in taxes doesn't make up for the amount we give him, he leaves us in a deficit of money that would be better spent elsewhere
Again: if Lance doesn't exist, every daily money-related thing that he does will no longer happen. That means that Mcdonalds will now lose $5 because a cheeseburger Lance could've gotten would not have been purchased.

Functional Society literally cannot exist without welfare or public support. If you were to live in this 'scenario' you suggest, you'd be working 16 hours a day at a local factory to afford bread crumbs.

What if you don't want to pay for a guy in Vermont to buy McDonalds?
That's too bad, you're going to anyways. Say goodbye to 0.000000001% of a cent every month.

Again: if Lance doesn't exist, every daily money-related thing that he does will no longer happen. That means that Mcdonalds will now lose $5 because a cheeseburger Lance could've gotten would not have been purchased.

Functional Society literally cannot exist without welfare or public support. If you were to live in this 'scenario' you suggest, you'd be working 16 hours a day at a local factory to afford bread crumbs.

Why not just cut out the middle man, that being Lance, and have the government subsidies McDonalds itself? If he doesn't work then nothing is gained, money is only lost.

in a world where mcdonalds needs to be subsidized

in a world where mcdonalds needs to be subsidized

In a world where path things someone using everyone elses money is somehow a benefit to society.

Why not just cut out the middle man, that being Lance, and have the government subsidies McDonalds itself? If he doesn't work then nothing is gained, money is only lost.
The government already subsidizes businesses on certain aspects. However, if taxes were to be payed for a meal at McDonalds and it would go towards nobody, you're essentially buying a ghost lunch and wasting the entire meal when you could buy it for Lance.

In a world where path things someone using everyone elses money is somehow a benefit to society.
That's the world we live in. Read a book on capitalism

In order for you to be an entire waste of space, you'd have to never spend any money ever. If 20% of the country didn't pay any money for anything, society would collapse
« Last Edit: April 09, 2017, 11:11:23 PM by PhantOS »