[NEWS] Colorado's investment in birth control reduces teen births by 50%

Author Topic: [NEWS] Colorado's investment in birth control reduces teen births by 50%  (Read 13181 times)

i was a little interested in responding to your post until i saw this. are you actually a sociopath?

Leftism is compassionate™

I could ask the same thing about you since you want to remove people like Phil Spencer from existence.

If someone can't fend for themselves, regardless of how much money you give them, then they are beyond your help.
theres a difference in thinking national socialists shouldn't hold public credibility and stating that you want all poor people to die, jackass.

No they aren't. I am my responsibility.
It's always interesting to see this libertarian frame of mind that everyone should be their own man and fend for themselves. Society functions because everyone is responsible for supporting it. This is why countries are able to go to war, have a working police system, health system, education, etc. If you want to live the 'i am my own responsibility' you'll probably be better off living in a tribe of anarchists.

Some people are just a hole of resources and should fade out of existence.
You know every human being in your country probably costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to keep alive, yourself included. You're as much of a 'hole of resources' as everyone else. Every time you take public transportation, you cost everyone money. Every time you break your arm and need medical insurance to cover it, you just robbed every single person of a tiny amount of resources.

As a consumer and a cog in your society, you're just as useless and useful as the next person. If you wanted to remove every 'resource hole' in your country, you'd destroy it.
« Last Edit: April 09, 2017, 10:35:45 PM by PhantOS »

theres a difference in thinking national socialists shouldn't hold public credibility and stating that you want all poor people to die, jackass.

I never said all poor people dumbforget. Learn to read

It's always interesting to see this libertarian frame of mind that everyone should be their own man and fend for themselves. Society functions because everyone is responsible for supporting it. This is why countries are able to go to war, have a working police system, health system, education, etc. If you want to live the 'i am my own responsibility' you'll probably be better off living in a tribe of anarchists.


Why should I be responsible for other peoples forgetups? Why should I fund people who will never benefit me or society as a whole?

You know every human being in your country probably costs hundreds of thousands of dollars a year to keep alive, yourself included. You're as much of a 'hole of resources' as everyone else. Every time you take public transportation, you cost everyone money. Every time you break your arm and need medical insurance to cover it, you just robbed every single person of a tiny amount of resources.

As a consumer and a cog in your society, you're just as useless and useful as the next person. If you wanted to remove every 'resource hole' in your country, you'd destroy it.

Except other people actually benefit the economy and pay for their own loving resources. They don't drag everyone else in society down with them.


School spending at large scales doesn't correlate because the signal is lost due to bureaucratic waste. But obviously a school that is terribly underfunded will do stufftier than a well-funded school on the basis that n-dollars has to be taken out of teachers and school programs at some point. You don't lose teachers and enrichment programs without hurting student achievement. Cutting the bureaucratic waste is fine, but cuts across the board hurt people. Mostly the poor.

Why should I be responsible for other peoples forgetups? Why should I fund people who will never benefit me or society as a whole?
Poor people pay taxes. they buy food from businesses. They spend money at stores. In order for you to contribute nothing to society, you'd have to not eat, drink, buy any goods from anyone, and just exist by yourself.

Except other people actually benefit the economy and pay for their own loving resources. They don't drag everyone else in society down with them.
You don't pay for all of your resources either. You're bringing society down a little bit and your criteria for 'who is bringing society down more' is probably just as handicapped as you. The reason you're alive is because everyone pays a little bit of money for you whether you like it or not. You're saying 'why should i have to contribute to society' in one paragraph and then in another saying 'people who dont contribute to society should cease to exist'
« Last Edit: April 09, 2017, 10:42:16 PM by PhantOS »

i was a little interested in responding to your post until i saw this. are you actually a sociopath?
the elderly and the poor are WEAK and must be left to FADE OUT OF EXISTENCE

It's cute considering that some people I know refuse raises so they can still be eligible for welfare.
there are always people who'll try to cheat the system, but there are way more people who are actually in need

Why should I be responsible for other peoples forgetups? Why should I fund people who will never benefit me or society as a whole?
they benefit you because they're the ones serving you taco bell

also, living conditions for people who try to earn money beyond welfare are worse because they earn less money than what the government was giving them because we allow corporations to exploit the working class

its literally smarter to stay on welfare than to work a minimum wage job because america refuses to implement reform

School spending at large scales doesn't correlate because the signal is lost due to bureaucratic waste. But obviously a school that is terribly underfunded will do stufftier than a well-funded school on the basis that n-dollars has to be taken out of teachers and school programs at some point. You don't lose teachers and enrichment programs without hurting student achievement. Cutting the bureaucratic waste is fine, but cuts across the board hurt people. Mostly the poor.

Good thing I never mentioned cutting anything. Just that we shouldn't be pumping people full of money because they shat out 3 kids.

Poor people pay taxes. they buy food from businesses. They spend money at stores. In order for you to contribute nothing to society, you'd have to not eat, drink, buy any goods from anyone, and just exist by yourself.

They buy stuff with money from the government that was forced from other peoples hands. It's like cutting off your leg to eat it for nutrients.

You don't pay for all of your resources either. You're bringing society down a little bit and your criteria for 'who is bringing society down more' is probably just as handicapped as you. The reason you're alive is because everyone pays a little bit of money for you whether you like it or not. You're saying 'why should i have to contribute to society' in one paragraph and then in another saying 'people who dont contribute to society should cease to exist'

My stuff until I was 18 was paid for by my parents, it was by choice. They could have aborted me but they chose not to. You can choose whether or not you want to donate to the poor if you want. Don't force me or anyone else to.

also, living conditions for people who try to earn money beyond welfare are worse because they earn less money than what the government was giving them because we allow corporations to exploit the working class

its literally smarter to stay on welfare than to work a minimum wage job because america refuses to implement reform

This is a good case for removing welfare altogether. Raising minimum wage fixes nothing Bernout

the elderly and the poor are WEAK and must be left to FADE OUT OF EXISTENCE



also, living conditions for people who try to earn money beyond welfare are worse because they earn less money than what the government was giving them because we allow corporations to exploit the working class

its literally smarter to stay on welfare than to work a minimum wage job because america refuses to implement reform

What does that reform look like Kimon

Good thing I never mentioned cutting anything. Just that we shouldn't be pumping people full of money because they shat out 3 kids.
I'm pretty sure this is not the case in either Canada or the US

Good thing I never mentioned cutting anything. Just that we shouldn't be pumping people full of money because they shat out 3 kids.
agreed. forget kids, they can starve

I'm pretty sure this is not the case in either Canada or the US

You're right, it isn't, but it's what Kimon wants if you read earlier into the thread.