the loot that the game is about isn't generated by a computer. loot that is generated by the computer is left on the ground and not looked at
But isn't that a bit silly lol? What's the point of it? What percentage of 1,000,000,000 guns in the next game are going to be left on the ground and ignored? Imagine if all the development cycles put into algorithms and systems for generating millions of guns and art for hundreds of parts for weapons that nobody is going to use was spent on making more unique/designed weapons.
I understand rewarding dedicated players, but the bulk of players are only going to exposed to these lame computer-made weapons. At any rate, a system that generates a desirable output less than like 10% of the time is a failure.
also every gun except some legendaries can all have these variations that do different stuff.
This is admittedly nowhere near as bad as I remembered, but how much does stuff like "-increased recoil -accuracy" actually mean in the long run? I'm sure this all amounts to millions of combinations of the base weapons but if you picked two out of the bunch how much would they actually differ from each other? At the end of the day it's still same stuff, different gun
So thousands and thousands of reviews mean nothing? Lol okay dude whatever you say, you're certainly more informed than the rest of us who played the game for a ton of time. We're all wrong and you're right! Guess it's just highly acclaimed by hundreds of thousands of bots. We aren't TRUE gamers like you are. Shut the forget up lol
God you're such a loving obnoxious moron lol, you seriously argue like a 15 year old. If you're so extremely insecure about people making memes of your face and physique that you're going to drag it around to every argument you get into, you probably shouldn't post images of your face and physique on an anonymous internet board while simultaneously being an unprovoked starfish to everyone you come across for years beforehand.
Anyways, nothing I said in that post involved me inflating my own authority on video games. Anyone on the planet can leave a steam review on a game. Quite frankly, anyone can be an IGN game journalist as well. There are very obvious conflicts of interest and a lack of objective standards in the game review industry. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that review systems are unreliable and exploitable, and that proper review of video games comes from an understanding of game design and brown townysis thereof, something 90% of true gamers or whatever aren't capable of. This is significantly more common with games that are extremely popular.
I'm not saying I'm well versed in brown townysis of game systems either or whatever the forget but at-least I'm trying to have a mature discussion about it lol idk