Wiki: Blockland

[gordonrox24]

Shut up gordon, GedUK removed the speedy and someone re-added it. You've failed now run off with your tail between your legs.

#  22:06, 24 April 2009 Ged UK (talk | contribs) (5,978 bytes) (A7 doesn't apply to software) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 21:58, 24 April 2009 70.122.210.8 (talk) (5,989 bytes) (→Development) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 21:51, 24 April 2009 70.122.210.8 (talk) (5,942 bytes) (→Development) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 21:04, 24 April 2009 72.154.25.212 (talk) (5,933 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 20:56, 24 April 2009 Gordonrox24 (talk | contribs) (5,915 bytes) (Replacing the speedy placed by User:Stifle that was removed.) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 16:04, 24 April 2009 99.194.188.123 (talk) (5,904 bytes) (→Features) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 15:56, 24 April 2009 71.127.110.213 (talk) (6,125 bytes) (→Development) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 15:54, 24 April 2009 79.75.159.174 (talk) (6,892 bytes) (Undid revision 285867585 by 71.127.110.213 (talk)) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 15:16, 24 April 2009 71.127.110.213 (talk) (6,704 bytes) (→Development) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 15:01, 24 April 2009 71.127.110.213 (talk) (6,892 bytes) (→Development) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 14:56, 24 April 2009 71.127.110.213 (talk) (6,731 bytes) (→Development) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 14:55, 24 April 2009 71.127.110.213 (talk) (6,777 bytes) (→Development) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 14:05, 24 April 2009 79.75.159.174 (talk) (6,394 bytes) (undo)
# (cur) (prev) 13:44, 24 April 2009 Stifle (talk | contribs) (6,405 bytes) (speedy) (undo)






That is the whole history. As we can see, Stifle added it. There were edits, and it got removed. You can then see me edit summary saying "Replacing the speedy placed by User:Stifle that was removed." and then a few edits after that the admin declined it. I only replaced it because an editor removed it.

[Ad Bot]

[Marcem]

Gordon, you've lost, now go.

[Ephialtes]

Its cute how you're investing so much time into making sure this single irrelevant wikipedia article is brought to justice. Just shows how pathetic and immature you are.

[gordonrox24]

I don't get it. You can fully see that I just replaced it. you guys are have very think skulls.

[GhostOfBetaTapes]

Any text in an article with no citation can be challenged and removed. Any article not proving it's notability can be sent to AFD for review.

Any text in an article that does not require citation that is reported for lack of citation is a bannable laughable offense.

Also, Cite this! Ha!  :D

I believe I've been a member of Wikipedia longer than you. I've read the rules at least three times.

EDIT: goddammit stop posting so fast!

[gordonrox24]

Its cute how you're investing so much time into making sure this single irrelevant wikipedia article is brought to justice. Just shows how pathetic and immature you are.

I spend this much time on all articles. Shows how little you know about how slow and time consuming wikipedia is.

[Noretic]

I spend this much time on all articles. Shows how little you know about how slow and time consuming wikipedia is.

Which begs the question, what sort of handicap dedicates their time to it?

[Kalphiter]

I spend this much time on all articles. Shows how little you know about how slow and time consuming wikipedia is.

You spend too much time over your jealousy. Seriously, trying to delete Blockland's article then comparing the result count to those of RuneScape.

[gordonrox24]

Which begs the question, what sort of handicap dedicates their time to it?

Which sort of handicap dedicates their time to posting on a forum complaining about worthless crap?

[Ephialtes]

I spend this much time on all articles. Shows how little you know about how slow and time consuming wikipedia is.

I don't think so. Out of 2,847,00 articles, you decided to try and get the Blockland article deleted purely because ROBLOX's article got deleted (due to the game being inferior and also irrelevant)

[Noretic]

Which sort of handicap dedicates their time to posting on a forum complaining about worthless crap?

You apparently, I'm multi tasking while doing some modeling. Just remember, you're the one complaining about the wiki page. You'rer the one making desperate attempts to defend your actions.

[gordonrox24]

You spend too much time over your jealousy. Seriously, trying to delete Blockland's article then comparing the result count to those of RuneScape.

What a dunce. The editor was talking about google hits and gnews, so I gave him the stats of a notable online game. That isn't part of my reasoning, it is just me comparing facts. The other editor didn't seem to mind, so why should you.

[Kalphiter]

What a dunce. The editor was talking about google hits and gnews, so I gave him the stats of a notable online game. That isn't part of my reasoning, it is just me comparing facts. The other editor didn't seem to mind, so why should you.

You're the one trying to defend your case of why Blockland's article should be deleted and yet you're attempting, and failing, to make a Roblox one.

[gordonrox24]

You apparently, I'm multi tasking while doing some modeling. Just remember, you're the one complaining about the wiki page. You'rer the one making desperate attempts to defend your actions.

I have nothing to defend. If I had things to defend, would I still have my e-mail address posted for the world to see? No. Nothing to hide. Just straight up facts. Modeling for an online game? how is that any better then posting on a forum.

[gordonrox24]

I don't think so. Out of 2,847,00 articles, you decided to try and get the Blockland article deleted purely because ROBLOX's article got deleted (due to the game being inferior and also irrelevant)

I have deleted 25 articles this month. Not just blockland.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/St._Gregory_the_Great_Parish

Started that AFD the same day as the blockland one.