Author Topic: Kerbal Space Program, Or: How I learned to stop worrying and love THRUSTERRRSSSS  (Read 268249 times)

From what I understand, more SAS may mean more stability. But I'm not 100% sure about that.
Also, if they really did only utilize control surfaces and such, those engines have thrust gimbling.

Jebediah Kermin for President
Jeb 2012

My mother tried building a space plane once.









many kerbals were lost.

From what I understand, more SAS may mean more stability. But I'm not 100% sure about that.
Also, if they really did only utilize control surfaces and such, those engines have thrust gimbling.

Main point is that only 1 is doing the job, the other two are just dead weight.

I'll test this now.

Editing with results. Food >= KSP
« Last Edit: September 30, 2012, 11:35:38 PM by J MASTER »


SKUNKY HAD TO QUIT
NNNNOOOOOOOOOOO


I thought adv. SAS didn't apply any forces to a craft, only utilizing the RCSs and Control surfaces on board to keep it straight. Therefore meaning that 1 would do exactly the same job as 3? I was under the impression that only standard SAS modules would apply a force.
ASAS apply force themselves


The spinning rocket throwing the pod idea didn't work.
I got 200m up.

So I decided to make a missile launcher.
My current design fires a missile anywhere from close-by to 4km away. (Which I can control)


SKUNKY HAD TO QUIT
NNNNOOOOOOOOOOO

I thought he got fired for loving up.

I thought he got fired for loving up.
That's what I meant.
I'm still sad ; ;

Jebediah Kermin for President
Jeb 2012

He can control the country from orbit of the sun