Earlier on Seventh Sandwich posted a link describing the definition of "law" and "theory." Apparently, despite how incorrect it sounds, theories are stronger then laws when it comes to explanations. We can see and reproduce micro-evolution and speciation, and also have dozens of other proofs that back up evolutionary change, but it would be a law if the only correct data we had was the reproducing. Theories can't become laws, but laws can be put into theories.
Also, No, I was not trying to start a religion argument.
This isn't an argument about religion, it's about theories of how species came to be. You're getting a bit off-topic.
It eventually came to that because a believer started preaching the standard religious ignorance and stupidity because of his faith, which pissed off some of our more intelligent users. A separate theory being presented in the thread could have started an intelligent debate if the proposer didn't deliberately ignore all evidence and then ragequit because he thought accepting a theory would "hurt" his faith.