The big bang also has some logical fallacies.
Such as?
Also you should look up what the term "logical fallacy" means because I don't think it means what you think it means
It's also worth mentioning that your post itself (specifically the picture) is a
logical fallacyHave any of those religions been disproven?
Christianity as a whole can't be disproven, but many individual claims, whether they be directly stated in the bible, or common belief not explicitly stated can/have been disproven: the age of the earth, the origin of species, the shape of the earth/solar system. Most Christians either deny these things (refusing to educate themselves about/acknowledge the evidence) or don't see it as contradicting their religion, and that's their choice
I still wonder why the atheist stuff bags are flameing christians EVERYWARE on the internet
Because Christianity is the only religion that they have first-hand experience with.
And I don't see it "everyware"
It's just a vocal minority, the majority of atheists are just "yeah whatever..."
A human kid born without legs won't spawn legless humans. Why would it work on whales
If the lack of legs was due to a genetic change (it would most likely just be a developmental defect), and the human mated with another human with the same genetic change, then
yes, they
would have (at least a large chance of having) legless kids.
Also this genetic mutation didn't just suddenly happen. His example was a grossly simplified example, in reality the change would have occured over many generations