Author Topic: Re: Kitty0706 is dead  (Read 29115 times)

What happened?

Kitty0706 dies, thread is made to mourn him, gothboy says some stuff, huge stuffstorm due to his views on medicine, original thread is derailed massively and ruined.



The Indians lived to be a pretty good age. It wasn't until english man gave them the tuberculosis virus when they started dying at young ages. I am not denying the fact that medical advances have helped people, but a lot of times there are more natural ways to solve illness than with man-made drugs.
"The Indians lived to be a pretty good age"

Bullstuff. There is no evidence that pre-Colombian Indian tribes had unusually long lifespans. Also, the American continent was home to tons of endemic diseases that even people with Native resistance would die from. If we had a reliable way of getting an 'average pre-Colombian Indian lifespan', it would probably be around age 30-40, which is what you can reasonably expect from societies that (with some notable exceptions) were nomadic and lacked any medicine or concept of sanitation.

This is about the life of Kitty0706 and how CBD oils could have saved him if the docs even attempted the treatment. This, however, we will never know.
Except they couldn't have because there's no evidence that shows they're effective nor is there any known chemical mechanism in cannabis oil that would plausibly treat cancer. You might as well be deriding the doctors for not prescribing a diet rich with quail eggs and rambutan because it 'could have saved him'.

CBD's can pass the blood-brain barrier. It just so happens that your body is born with natural CBD receptors.
So can neurotoxins, which, characteristically, connect to receptors as well. It's almost as if drug-absorption has nothing to do with efficacy.

I have no problem with other's beliefs. The only reason this thread was created is because I support using CBD oils for cancer instead of chemo and radiation. The doctors did not try any form of CBD treatment, they went straight to surgery. People say I am a "stoner hippe" because I believe marijuana has medical uses, but CBD extracts have nothing to do with the THC in weed that gets you high.
The reason you are receiving slack has nothing to do with the fact you wanted Kitty0706 to take cannabis oil. Cannabis oil is reasonably safe and probably wouldn't interfere with anything, even though it wouldn't have any effect on his cancer prognosis.

The reason you are receiving slack is because you are implying that chemo and radiation therapy, which have ridiculously substantial amounts of scientific research backing their efficacy, are lesser treatments than cannabis oil, a 'treatment' which has none of that. You are literally misinforming people.

I found some evidence to corroborate what I said about Native American tribes:

Quote
Even so, in the simplest hunter-gatherer societies, few people survived past age 50. In the healthiest cultures in the 1,000 years before Columbus, a life span of no more than 35 years might be usual.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/29/science/don-t-blame-columbus-for-all-the-indians-ills.html

native americans all died to now preventable diseases cured by vaccinations

literally the only reason not to be vaccinated is if you are a crazy person who believes that vaccines cause autism because of completely unfounded evidence provided by actresses and eccentrics.

vaccines are also super important because even if your immune system can fight off infection, there are immuno-deficient people who cannot get vaccinated as their immune system is inadequate to even fight off the small dose of virus they give you to build immunity. you put them at risk just by existing and being unvaccinated.

you're basically super greedy if you don't take the shot. it's painless, has been well documented to have no side effects that weirdos get freaked out over, and can save people's lives including your own.

native americans all died to now preventable diseases cured by vaccinations

literally the only reason not to be vaccinated is if you are a crazy person who believes that vaccines cause autism because of completely unfounded evidence provided by actresses and eccentrics.

vaccines are also super important because even if your immune system can fight off infection, there are immuno-deficient people who cannot get vaccinated as their immune system is inadequate to even fight off the small dose of virus they give you to build immunity. you put them at risk just by existing and being unvaccinated.

you're basically super greedy if you don't take the shot. it's painless, has been well documented to have no side effects that weirdos get freaked out over, and can save people's lives including your own.
This, I never got mine because I was a little pusillanimous individual who was like 'forget needles' then I realized a needle is nothing after attempting to give blood yesterday.
I should probably get them updated.

"Marijuana is a drug JUST A DRUG it can never help people with anything! Proven studies that CBD oils can help cure and prevent cancer are just myths from a bunch of idiot stoners! Weed is bad!!11!"
http://vactruth.com/2012/08/12/vaccinations-killing-kids/
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Health_Concerns/Vaccines/vaccinations_can_kill.htm
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/05/12/vaccination-dangers.aspx
It's already been shown that you have a terrible track record of reading the sources you're supplying because you considered a case study to be a 'proven study' that shows cannabis oil is an effective treatment. Now, let's look at these ones you've given us:

http://vactruth.com/2012/08/12/vaccinations-killing-kids/

This article you've linked is a prime example of why vactruth.com has such a stunningly terrible reputation as a promoter of quack-medicine and conspiracy theorism. First of all, the only real claims it makes against vaccines are that 'babies get too many' and 'there are some reported deaths from vaccines'. The rest of the article is just unverified anecdotes that are worth absolutely nothing as evidence.

The first claim, that 'babies get too many vaccines', has no substance. There isn't any evidence showing that current vaccine schedules have 'too much' of anything. Every single adjuvant in vaccines has been studied by toxicologists whose single job is to make sure that they're providing a safe dosage.

The second one, that 'there are some reported deaths', is probably half true. There are probably a few cases of people who have had bizarre, ridiculously rare reactions to vaccines and have died from them. However, the incidence of these kinds of reactions is just laughably small. If you read the article you gave me, you would have seen that it cites an Australian News source that claims there have been 5 deaths from vaccines in the last 4 years. Now, out of millions of people, that is such an unfathomably low percentage that it's difficult to even measure whether they died because of something in the vaccine or just keeled-over from something else by pure statistical probability. Either way, the chance of you dying from the flu is much higher than the chance of dying from the vaccine, and the numbers on this website prove it.

Quote
http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Health_Concerns/Vaccines/vaccinations_can_kill.htm

I hope, for your sake, that you didn't even read this one and just copied it blindly from Google. This is a nonsensical rant from someone who probably suffers from one or two undiagnosed mental illnesses. No retort necessary.

Quote
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2004/05/12/vaccination-dangers.aspx

This is another website that, much like vactruth.com, has garnered an awful reputation for spreading information that has been repeatedly debunked by people with college degrees. The first inaccuracy with this article is that it attributes the causes of autism and ADD/ADHD to 'free radicals', a claim which has never been substantiated. Second, the article provides a half baked explanation of vaccines that isn't even correct at some parts. For example:

Quote
Because more and more reports are appearing citing vaccine failure, their manufacturers’ answer is to make the vaccines more potent. They do this by making the immune adjuvants more powerful or adding more of them.

This is completely wrong. Reports citing vaccine failure are usually talking about seasonal flu vaccines, which are created based on a prediction of what flu strain will hit an area the hardest. Whether or not these vaccines work has nothing to do with how much adjuvant is in them (which are responsible for preserving vaccines and creating an immune response with less actual viral material). There are no reports that vaccine manufacturers have been increasing the amount of adjuvants to counteract vaccine failures, which leads me to believe that the author made it up.

Finally, the author makes several conclusions which weren't adequately substantiated in the rest of the article, like 'giving multiple vaccines is sheer idiocy' and 'vaccines cause brain damage'. Of course, I'm sure that's the only part you read in the entire article.

I hope, for your sake, that you didn't even read this one and just copied it blindly from Google. This is a nonsensical rant from someone who probably suffers from one or two undiagnosed mental illnesses. No retort necessary.
lol that website looks like it was designed to be trollbait.

lol that website looks like it was designed to be trollbait.
What was your first clue, the URL or the rainbow WARNING gif that looks like its from the early 90s lmao.

This argument is in full swing.


dont forget that this bag of genius has a kid

I hope, for your sake, that you didn't even read this one and just copied it blindly from Google. This is a nonsensical rant from someone who probably suffers from one or two undiagnosed mental illnesses. No retort necessary.

OH MY GOD i just looked at the site and i'm dying help

dont forget that this bag of genius has a kid
what

gothboy77 had a kid?

he used to be a cityrpg moderator  :cookieMonster: