Author Topic: Maxx: A Case Study on BLF's Worst User  (Read 65348 times)


MAXX I CAn'T BELIEVE YOU DID THAT

Zealot just got roasted and put in his place. Great job McJobless
it's pretty hard to put someone in their place when they aren't in the debate. maybe he should've spoken when i was still able to talk.

I STARTED TALKING ABOUT JOINING HIS CYTUBE TO PROVE MY INNOCENCE AND HE loving LEFT OH MY GOD
no lol, swholli can verify this. i joined to listen in even though i couldn't keep talking cause my relatives got home. when i didn't get audio, i left again. but yea, go ahead. cytube is always open

it's pretty hard to put someone in their place when they aren't in the debate. maybe he should've spoken when i was still able to talk.
no lol, swholli can verify this. i joined to listen in even though i couldn't keep talking cause my relatives got home. when i didn't get audio, i left again. but yea, go ahead. cytube is always open
according to swholli he said you were only able to hear me
and yet you still left when i said i was going to join your cytube to prove my innocence

according to swholli he said you were only able to hear me
and yet you still left when i said i was going to join your cytube to prove my innocence
Why would joining the cytube prove your innocence if you have a dynamic ip


Why would joining the cytube prove your innocence if you have a dynamic ip

oh my loving god hes said like 60 times now that his ip is still the same

I give him 11 minutes
NoEdit: WHERE DID ALL THESE PAGES COME FROM

oh my loving god hes said like 60 times now that his ip is still the same
wait lol yeah my mistake

Hey zealot, remember when you said its highly unlikely and that the ip that was on the cytube was me?
lets take it a step further and join your cytube under the ip you claim is me
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yl7K4damZnA
sorry.

^ this post is incorrect for reasons i will not be able to detail until friday. i believe several other users will be able to vouch for me on this.

^ this post is incorrect for reasons i will not be able to detail until friday. i believe several other users will be able to vouch for me on this.
it's tuesday, what's stopping explanation?

i'm no technowizard but how is it incorrect
if you banned the 73.74. ip, and he joined under his 73.74. ip, isn't it pretty clear that he didn't do it?


i didn't take timezones into thought lol, technically Wednesday for everyone
my b