Is it okay to be Gay?

[Frequency]

humans are conscious creatures who can determine the implications of their actions far into the future. we can determine an overabundance of reproduction could lead to problems around the world. thats not going to stop reproduction, but thats definitely gonna make people rethink what they know about it and approach things differently

So why would animals display homoloveual behavior because humans are sapient? Does that mean humans decide to be homoloveual so they don't contribute to overpopulation?

A species being conscious doesn't relate to the phenomena we see in each species. Evolution cannot be conscious in any regard.

[Ad Bot]

[mod-man]

So why would animals display homoloveual behavior because humans are sapient?

because homoloveual behavior doesn't always stem from homoloveual tendencies. some animals mate with the same love as a display of power and authority. that same mindset exists in humans as well

[Frequency]

because homoloveual behavior doesn't always stem from homoloveual tendencies. some animals mate with the same love as a display of power and authority. that same mindset exists in humans as well

I've never seen a man who wanted to have love with another man because it was a power move.

[mod-man]

I've never seen a man who wanted to have love with another man because it was a power move.

the stereotypical "having love with inmates in jail" can typically be seen as a power move. its why "making someone your bitch" is a saying

[Lego lad]

I've never seen a man who wanted to have love with another man because it was a power move.

uh

its in the bible actually

[Frequency]

the stereotypical "having love with inmates in jail" can typically be seen as a power move. its why "making someone your bitch" is a saying

Oh yeah.
But giving into loveual desires and loving the nearest living thing to relieve yourself doesn't seem to relate to "determining an overabundance of reproduction" and "rethinking what they know about [reproduction] and approaching things differently."

uh

its in the bible actually

For the sake of asserting dominance? I'd like to know which passage.

[beachbum111111]

one of the Captain Underpants books (The Sensational Saga of Sir Stinks-A-Lot) has been getting some flak recently for Dav Pilkey secretly admitting that one of the main characters (Harold Hutchins) is gay.

Are the main characters still 10 years old? How the forget are you suppose to tell if you're gay or not if you haven't hit puberty?

[mod-man]

Oh yeah.
But giving into loveual desires and loving the nearest living thing to relieve yourself doesn't seem to relate to "determining an overabundance of reproduction" and "rethinking what they know about [reproduction] and approaching things differently.

people arent being gay for the good of humanity. im simply pointing out humans are a conscious enough species to be aware of their imperfections and what they can lead to. even if those imperfections lie on an evolutionary level

[Frequency]

im simply pointing out humans are a conscious enough species to be aware of their imperfections and what they can lead to. even if those imperfections come from how we've evolved

I'm still not sure of the point you're trying to get across. Humans are sapient, animals are not. A consciousness of evolution is not apparent in either, and if evolution were conscious (which it would need to be for it to be a possible explanation for life at all), it's doing a terrible job considering that the majority of mutations are imperfections.
And since humans are conscious enough to be aware of their imperfections and what they can lead to, then there would be more reason to avoid homoloveuality for the sake of self-preservation.

[beachbum111111]

Lol

[Satan From Wreck-It-Ralph]

frequency is in denial about his true love
sucking richards

[Frequency]

Lol

frequency is in denial about his true love
sucking richards

you got me

[IkeTheGeneric]

I'm having a hard time following this argument, everything everyone is saying is really stupid and convoluted

[mod-man]

And since humans are conscious enough to be aware of their imperfections and what they can lead to, then there would be more reason to avoid homoloveuality for the sake of self-preservation.

ok but gay love doesnt kill a threatening amount of people. theres no reason humans as a species shouldnt have gay love. just because the risk is higher doesnt mean its high enough to ward of people who really want to do it

I'm having a hard time following this argument, everything everyone is saying is really stupid and convoluted

itd probably be easier if frequency would stop editing in points to address after hes posted and using incorrect quotes

[Lego lad]

For the sake of asserting dominance? I'd like to know which passage.

iirc yeah, in genesis 19

some guys tried to gang-rape a man named Lot and in that time period a male raping a male was a way of shaming them