Author Topic: [HISTORIC] Boy Scouts to admit girls into their ranks  (Read 22355 times)

how lazy do you have to be to say instead of fixing the girl scouts girls should be thrown into the boy group

how the hell do you suppose that's a joke? it's (to some degree) hyperbole but he clearly believes that it is a genuine issue

how can you take any comment about society being destroyed seriously

but why segregate the groups in the first place

how lazy do you have to be to say instead of fixing the girl scouts girls should be thrown into the boy group
you got the money for that stuff?

there's one for boys and one for girls. this is like asking why there's two different bathrooms

you got the money for that stuff?

no im broke sorry

but why segregate the groups in the first place
yeah this pretty much
there's really no reason to, the only reason they were separate organizations in the first place because society was a whole lot more loveist when they were founded

but yes girls should be allowed into the "boy" scouts and why not the reverse too? why the forget are they even still separate organizations? just combine them into the scouts or some stuff come on

there's one for boys and one for girls. this is like asking why there's two different bathrooms
bathrooms are separated because the relevant biology is different you dipstuff
as far as i know, snakees are not integral to the function of the boy scouts and vaginas are not integral to the function of the girl scouts
this is common sense
« Last Edit: October 11, 2017, 11:09:43 PM by TristanLuigi »

this is like asking why there's two different bathrooms
i dunno, why are there

it's much less expensive to call boy scouts scouts than to improve girl scouts

nobody thinks it's harmful they just think it's really dumb
right, clearly people put some kind of value in the idea of this organization being boys-only tho. i'm wondering why it actually matters

how lazy do you have to be to say instead of fixing the girl scouts girls should be thrown into the boy group
am i actually wrong in my assumption that girl scouts is completely different and unaffiliated with boy scouts? it doesn't make sense to assume that you can coordinate between the two unless that's the case. regardless, the girl scouts don't seem like an exact counterpart

and still, why is it a problem to allow different genders in? is keeping it exclusive really worth more than the costs of building a nation-wide equivalent to a 107-year-old? i don't see the point. just let more people into your clubhouse

it's much less expensive to call boy scouts scouts than to improve girl scouts
yeah basically
although if you rename the "boy scouts" to "scouts" and allow girls in, what do you rename the girl scouts to if you let boys in hm

yeah basically
although if you rename the "boy scouts" to "scouts" and allow girls in, what do you rename the girl scouts to if you let boys in hm
"pusillanimous individual cookie wimp scouts"

merge them brother gotdamn

"pusillanimous individual cookie wimp scouts"
hm
you may be on to something.

yeah basically
although if you rename the "boy scouts" to "scouts" and allow girls in, what do you rename the girl scouts to if you let boys in hm
"child labor"

i dunno, why are there

why do cats come in different colors who gives a forget

and still, why is it a problem to allow different genders in? is keeping it exclusive really worth more than the costs of building a nation-wide equivalent to a 107-year-old? i don't see the point. just let more people into your clubhouse

i don't see the point of conjoining them. just seems like everyone wants diversity for no reason

"child labor"
"the ones that the child enthusiast pays to refund"