Author Topic: Wiki: Blockland (Read 34553 times)

Tom · April 24, 2009, 10:28:01 PM

Quote from: gordonrox24 on April 24, 2009, 09:54:35 PM

It is a terrible violation of WP:POV

Maybe you should actually contribute by adding more and fixing articles, instead of nomination 25 for deletion.

GAH, PLEASE STOP USING ALL THOSE WP:RULESTUFF THINGS. TELL US HOW ITS BREAKING THE RULE.

Also, your point of view is just as biased as a Roblox player.

Ad Bot · Advertisement

IceBlue · April 24, 2009, 10:33:59 PM

I'm not one to make violent accusations on a Saturday because it's my day off but seriously, you need to think through things more. This is no way to get respect. If your own personal vendettas' need fulfilment, go slit your wrists in the corner and sob about how your life is incomplete.

Ladios · April 24, 2009, 11:14:09 PM

Quote from: IceBlue on April 24, 2009, 10:33:59 PM

I'm not one to make violent accusations on a Saturday because it's my day off but seriously, you need to think through things more. This is no way to get respect. If your own personal vendettas' need fulfilment, go slit your wrists in the corner and sob about how your life is incomplete.

But he isn't trying to get respect. He is just doing his job. He has no vendetta against Blockland, infact hes even played the demo version!

ChexGuy331 · April 24, 2009, 11:31:19 PM

I SWEAR I've seen this gordonrox guy around here before.

Tom · April 24, 2009, 11:44:02 PM

He started a roblox topic.

Feep · April 25, 2009, 12:13:56 AM

You guys did well on the wiki.
:D

Reactor Worker · April 25, 2009, 12:39:28 AM

Why not just update the Gamespot page for Blockland. It is a refutable, third party source and it appears most games mentioned on Wikipedia use it as a reference.

You could plenty of screenshots put up on there for it and list out the features.

gordonrox24 · April 25, 2009, 08:08:43 AM

Quote from: SeventhSandwich on April 24, 2009, 10:05:08 PM

Notice how if you search roblox on wiki, it's not there.

No stuff sherlock.

gordonrox24 · April 25, 2009, 08:10:32 AM

Quote from: Tom on April 24, 2009, 10:28:01 PM

Maybe you should actually contribute by adding more and fixing articles, instead of nomination 25 for deletion.

GAH, PLEASE STOP USING ALL THOSE WP:RULESTUFF THINGS. TELL US HOW ITS BREAKING THE RULE.

Also, your point of view is just as biased as a Roblox player.

I have only started 50+ articles.

Wedge · April 25, 2009, 08:50:59 AM

Fantastic. Evidently you learned nothing over those "50 articles," and it doesn't change the fact that you're a pathetic troll.

Revert all his edits everyone. If he continues to vandalize the article report him.

gordonrox24 · April 25, 2009, 09:19:15 AM

Quote from: Wedge on April 25, 2009, 08:50:59 AM

Fantastic. Evidently you learned nothing over those "50 articles," and it doesn't change the fact that you're a pathetic troll.

Revert all his edits everyone. If he continues to vandalize the article report him.

I`m not vandalizing. Really, anybody who is adding info without a citation is.

Marcem · April 25, 2009, 09:26:10 AM

Quote from: gordonrox24 on April 25, 2009, 09:19:15 AM

I`m not vandalizing. Really, anybody who is adding info without a citation is.

We' re not vandalizing. Really, anybody who is biased and is trying to delete it is.

gordonrox24 · April 25, 2009, 09:27:16 AM

Quote from: Marcem on April 25, 2009, 09:26:10 AM

We' re not vandalizing. Really, anybody who is biased and is trying to delete it is.

I am not biased. I have not strayed from the rules of Wikipedia. All editors here have though.

DrMobius · April 25, 2009, 09:31:52 AM

Quote from: gordonrox24 on April 25, 2009, 09:27:16 AM

I am not biased. I have not strayed from my interpretation of the rules of Wikipedia. All editors here have not though from their interpretations.

Am I correct is saying that it can, like all rules, be interpreted in multiple ways?

Tom · April 25, 2009, 10:47:42 AM

I want you to make a list of the rules were breaking and how we're breaking them.