Wiki: Blockland

[Ephialtes]

I am not biased. I have not strayed from the rules of Wikipedia. All editors here have though.

Biased doesn't necessarily mean you have to break the rules, It just means you're going out of your way to be a richard - which is irrefutable by the way. I don't see any of the other wikipedia users signing up on our forums to explain the reasons for deleting our article.

[Ad Bot]

[Tom]

Someone needs to add a reference to the RTB site on the part were it says "Return to Blockland continues to work alongside Eric, and are aiming their mod at the Retail community." So the wikitroll doesn't think he can delete it.

Edit:

I am not biased. I have not strayed from the rules of Wikipedia. All editors here have though.

Look what I found!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IAR

[Ephialtes]

Someone needs to add a reference to the RTB site on the part were it says "Return to Blockland continues to work alongside Eric, and are aiming their mod at the Retail community." So the wikitroll doesn't think he can delete it.

I'll have to recruit the help of our Official RTB Wordsmith (Wedge) to appropriately notify people that RTB exists on the Blockland page.

[Tom]

Do you think it would be OK if I Cited the 'and then added in Version 11, released on the 16th of march 2009.' part with a link to the Official BL website?

I do.

[Kalphiter]

Someone needs to add a reference to the RTB site on the part were it says "Return to Blockland continues to work alongside Eric, and are aiming their mod at the Retail community." So the wikitroll doesn't think he can delete it.

Also the fact that RTB 2.02 was moments after V11 just proves that.

[gordonrox24]

Biased doesn't necessarily mean you have to break the rules, It just means you're going out of your way to be a richard - which is irrefutable by the way. I don't see any of the other wikipedia users signing up on our forums to explain the reasons for deleting our article.

I only did that after people from blockland started to vandalize my talk page.

[gordonrox24]

Am I correct is saying that it can, like all rules, be interpreted in multiple ways?

Oh, for sure.

[Reactor Worker]

Edit:Look what I found!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IAR

That page, and more specifically this page seem to indicate that Gordon's behavior isn't really warranted.

Mindlessly following the rules isn't what makes Wikipedia better, adding factual information is. The features of Blockland and the related information that should be displayed on the article needn't be backed up by third party sources. If it is accurate and unbiased, by consensus, then the article doesn't need to be deleted.

I agree the page does need more information and some reformatting, but deleting it doesn't solve anything.

[tails]

I just noticed that the part about alpha and retail mod's doesn't say anything about good old BLM :o

[gordonrox24]

That page, and more specifically this page seem to indicate that Gordon's behavior isn't really warranted.

Mindlessly following the rules isn't what makes Wikipedia better, adding factual information is. The features of Blockland and the related information that should be displayed on the article needn't be backed up by third party sources. If it is accurate and unbiased, by consensus, then the article doesn't need to be deleted.

I agree the page does need more information and some reformatting, but deleting it doesn't solve anything.

Ignore the rules if the article cannot be improved within the rules.

By adding info without reference, you are not helping or improving the article, as a Bot will come along and delete all that info anyway.

[Messes]

It's roblox. Think of them as a little immature gay group of stuff, that together: Plot plans to "destroy" Blockland or "ruin" it all because they think they would be cool and want more people to join their society. They are simply jealous and know very well their community is obsolete.

Atmoshpir sucks, join ROBLOX! It's free and you can build anything

Real quote.

They simply get butt hurt and do everything in their power (which is not a lot BTW) to try and stop everything.

[tails]

Ignore the rules if the article cannot be improved within the rules.

The article can't be improved with the rules, leave now please.

[Tom]

Ignore the rules if the article cannot be improved within the rules.

By adding info without reference, you are not helping or improving the article, as a Bot will come along and delete all that info anyway.

No, we are. If we are adding more true, interesting, useful information, it is making the article better.

EDIT: The way the pictures are laid out doesn't look very good.

[gordonrox24]

No, we are. If we are adding more true, interesting, useful information, it is making the article better.

EDIT: The way the pictures are laid out don't look very good.

Yes, you are improving it until the bot is turned on and it deletes everything on every article that isn't cited. Then we are just back where we started.

[bushner]

So gordon your planning on deleting an article so that it can improve?