Messages

1

Off Topic / Re: night discussion topic i guess [night 183] [forget the rules then]

« on: November 20, 2016, 04:43:42 AM »

I also have this weird compulsion of having to evenly distribute the cold-cut(s), like, i'll stack the slices of bologna on each other, but they're affixed to the corners of one of the bread slices while the other bread slice waits to go on top, so it's thicker toward the middle of the sandwich where the slices of bologna meet, but it's more evenly distrubted along the outside

With turkey breast, since they're longer than the bread, i'll try to fold or break up the turkey breast so that it's not making the sandwich uneven

fold the meat in half and put the straight edge towards to outside of the sandwich, to make like an inverse circle

2

Off Topic / Re: UCLA Shooting - Murder-Self Delete, lockdown lifted, classes cancelled

« on: June 01, 2016, 04:02:04 PM »

inb4thebritishpeoplecomeintocomplainaboutAmericasgunregulation

I never understood the gun regulation in America

only discount french so far but we're on the right track

3

Off Topic / Re: A man went POSTAL at UCLA.

« on: June 01, 2016, 03:49:03 PM »

dude lord tony's been attention whoring literally the entire time i've been on BLF

it's not that new and crazy of a thing

4

Off Topic / Re: UCLA Shooting - Murder-Self Delete, lockdown lifted, classes cancelled

« on: June 01, 2016, 03:47:38 PM »

Why can't they try dueling it out with the cops for once?

at high noon in the city square

with revolvers

to the death

5

Off Topic / Re: A man went POSTAL at UCLA.

« on: June 01, 2016, 03:39:12 PM »

But you know it happened, what do I need to back up to prove it happened then? You already know.

...what's the point of a second thread then?

6

Off Topic / Re: UCLA Shooting - Murder-Self Delete, lockdown lifted, classes cancelled

« on: June 01, 2016, 03:37:59 PM »

I never understood the gun regulation in America

it only took 31 minutes for this discussion to become about gun control

congratulations guys i think that's a new record

7

Off Topic / Re: Man imprisoned in russia for 2 years over social post.

« on: June 01, 2016, 03:35:46 PM »

idk why people get so pissed at SJWs when they have:

1. essentially no power in politics
2. essentially no effect on day-to-day life
3. essentially no effect on the internet unless you search for them

like ok, we get it, you want to bitch about something that effects you very little

also, posts like these where something happening is bent to be about SJWs somehow even though there is literally no SJW stuff in here

this is an echo chamber; what is here to be discussed, that you think "free speech should be protected, no matter what the content is"? no stuff dude, that's what everybody thinks

8

Off Topic / Re: UCLA Shooting - Two fricking dead, campus on lockdown

« on: June 01, 2016, 03:22:41 PM »

I just realized a school shooting in your city would be a perfect time to commit a crime

GTA Online heist when

9

Off Topic / Re: [MEGATHREAD] Personal Computer - Updated builds thanks to Logical Increments

« on: May 30, 2016, 02:58:37 PM »

i wish i could get a VR headset for EVE: Valkyrie

seems pretty overhyped to me

i mean, sure, it'd be cool for like 2 days or so to fly around and shoot stuff in vr but it's just not that deep of a game

10

Off Topic / Outbox broken for banned users, while Inbox isn't?

« on: May 30, 2016, 05:47:41 AM »

I've been reading through the stupid stuff I said on my old (banned) account for kicks, but it's kinda one-sided. I can't see my outbox, and it says something about "not being allowed to use this feature" which makes me assume that it's got some sort of loophole that allows banned users to PM (??).

So I guess PM me stuff I sent you as Darkness ZXW between like 2010-2013 for a trip through time

edit: here's the error:

An Error Has Occurred!
You are not allowed to send personal messages.

11

Off Topic / Re: USA, srsly?? bra holsters??

« on: February 22, 2016, 07:42:43 PM »

Listen here, you come from a country full of incest, and it's disgusting.  Please forget off with that "we don't need to defend ourselves with guns because guns don't exist in the first place" junk.  It is in the USA constitution, a thing your country probably doesn't have.  The second amendment states that we have a right to a well armed militia to defend ourselves.  This dates back to when the British decided to attack us for not doing what they said.  It is also to, yes, defend ourselves if the government gets too out of control and starts doing what the British did.  Then we have a right to defend our rights.

wat

12

Off Topic / Re: USA, srsly?? bra holsters??

« on: February 22, 2016, 06:21:44 PM »

Its like your arguments are any better.
"Tools that kill people are great whoo!"
And dont bullstuff me about self defense because you dont need to defend yourself from guns if people dont have guns in the first place

i don't think you're seeing what i'm arguing here and that may be my fault, so i'll lay it out clearly:

1. making guns illegal will do harm, not good
1.1 the war on drugs can be a useful example of what making something illegal can do.
1.1.1 making drugs illegal made it harder for people to get help
1.1.2 it stopped legal, ethical production and gave all the money to vicious, murderous cartels
1.1.3 drugs are more common than ever
1.1.4 drugs are now more unsafe than before, due to no oversight on what is put in them
1.2 making guns illegal will only stop people who want to use them legally; if someone wants a gun so badly they will get it, whether or not it is legal.
2. guns can be used correctly and safely
2.1 there are many sport-shooting and hunting applications of guns, such as:
2.1.1 game hunting
2.1.2 curbing invasive species such as wild boar
2.1.3 defending rural homes from wildlife such as mountain lions
2.1.4 target shooting and gun clubs
3. self-defense with guns is indeed not very useful
3.1 indeed, having a gun isn't super useful if you are being mugged; just let them take you money, not worth the risk
3.2 if someone is coming at you with a knife, it is impossible to draw a gun and fire if they are closer than 21 feet(around that, i think i watched a mythbusters episode about this)
3.3 i can, however, see how it could be useful in home-defense type situations

13

Off Topic / Re: USA, srsly?? bra holsters??

« on: February 22, 2016, 06:02:14 PM »

A left leaning Belgian teen

wait is espio from argentina or belgium? i don't know whether to call him a puta or kanker
EDIT:
oh ok it's pastry that's argentinian nvm

If you try hard enough you can be denser then osmium

this is truly a great argument A+ really counters the main point of what i was saying

imo guns shouldnt be allowed for civilians

wow really i couldn't have guessed

14

Off Topic / Re: USA, srsly?? bra holsters??

« on: February 22, 2016, 05:52:39 PM »

IF
Its not the situation. Its the principle

"it's not the situation"
"that wouldn't work in this situation"

15

Off Topic / Re: USA, srsly?? bra holsters??

« on: February 22, 2016, 05:39:57 PM »

to be fair a walmart gun will probably explode on the tenth bullet

all guns explode on the first bullet hardy har har