The fact you're resulting to how people are "arguing" says a lot.
YOU STILL WILL NOT MAKE AN ACTUAL COUNTER ARGUMENT. YOU HAVE MADE FIVE POSTS OVER THE COURSE OF THIS DISCUSSION AND NONE OF THEM ARE RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION WE WERE HAVING.
I laughed
no substance
Kearn is a bad noodle :(
no substance
Ouch, ironic counters.
ambiguity
Because you lost the argument over 4+ people and they're insulting you for how stupid you are at trying to prove something or other because you insulted them, and then you go and tell them how stupid they are for insulting the insultee. Or something. It's just wrong and you're a loving ignoramus.
claiming i lost an argument you had no part in. more than half of this post is one unintelligible runon sentence. you then tack on an insult. gold star.
The fact you're resulting to how people are "arguing" says a lot.
almost made it. ALMOST.
also ad hominem or not, kearn, you should practice what you preach :n
the posts i am referring to exist solely to call me dumb. i am condescending to people who are condescending to me.
i do not start off arguments calling people names or telling them how their argument is dumb unless they make a completely baseless attack on someone or something that has done nothing wrong.
this post is my debut into the minimum wage argument. i did not insult anyone or anyone's position in that post because nobody was insulting me or my position. i am rude to people who are rude. i am not rude to people who are not rude. this is fair and simple.
the first post was an aggressive response to an aggressive post from shadowsfear (who is still not actually making any points aside from that i am indeed dumb) who told someone that their position is not valid because they are religious. this is an absurd argument and was rewarded with an aggressive one-line response.
the second post was a sarcastic response to clone who had previously been condescending and sarcastic in a previous post. this may have been overbearing.
the third post was an exasperated response to muslim who after three posts would not explain what he was talking about.
the fourth post was yet another aggressive response to shadowsfear who again did not post anything of substance but posted solely for the purpose of saying my argument was dumb.
the fifth post was an aggressive response to acerblock who called me stupid/a troll/[insert negative noun/adjective here]
he has done this kind of thing before. as soon as he runs out of immediate responses he waits until someone else agrees with him and then proceeds to say "SO MUCH THIS KEARN YOU ARE XXXXX". this is why it is frustrating to try to have a discussion with him. his
first post was fine. i responded to his and other's posts in kind. he then insulted me. i responded in kind.
kearn is a republican too! coincidence? i think not!
gold star
Maybe you can consider the fact that people are making these statements because you've remained ignorant and one-sided towards any points
so because i am arguing a concept that easily functions logically and don't agree with your moral system i am ignorant and one-sided?
It's their last resort because you're really not worth debating with, and that's what they're trying to tell you.
yes. their last resort is resorting to calling me names. i noticed.
I have to wonder why kearn sticks around when nearly the entire forum thinks he's a forgetwut
because everyone believing the exact same thing is a dumb idea. nothing will ever change. everyone benefits from discussion. nearly the entirity of the western world was told the world was flat. it was not.
