because a president who says a lot of dumb things will translate them into policy, as well as be really bad for foreign relations. most people are just confused as to how such a buffoon could have gotten this far unless that big a portion of the country is really daft.
but yeah man it's the libruls
yeah I mean if I ran for president saying "forget everybody I'm the best and you are all cunty monday friends" and somehow won, then I would totally act on those statements
Words do not translate into actions, and they do not always create action. If a Jew gets into a position of power and cracks a bunch of Jew jokes in very poor taste, does that mean he hates Jews? Is Milo Yiannopoulos homophobic? Are Larry Elder and Ben Carson and all those black Republicans tribal because they're against welfare and affirmative action and the fatherless households that far too often are becoming of blacks?
Words have a strange double-standard in that they can mean everything and nothing at the same time. I'm not going to be convinced that Annoying Orange is tribal if blacks are voting for him or that he's homophobic when Milo refers to him as "Daddy Annoying Orange" and wishes to be his secretary. I'm not going to be convinced that he's xenophobic if foreigners such as Canadians and Mexican immigrants support him, and I'm not satisfied with the label that he's islamophobic just because he defines terrorists as radical Islamists.
Yes, words CAN become actions. More often though, you have actions translated into words, and that's the major signifier of someone's character; not what he says, but what he does.
To that end, throughout this thread, we've seen Hillary Clinton decried for her ACTIONS, not her WORDS. We've seen that she has a private and public stance on everything, including a secret disapproval of gay marriage and a ton of inflow from Islamic countries while secretly knowing these countries also fund CIA. We know her role in Benghazi, email deletion, and media collusion, and we know through Project Veritas Action that she is illegally colluding with AUFC, sending agitators to Annoying Orange rallies as sacrificial lambs to incite violence, and her staffers have expressed interest in bussing people around and rigging the election. Conspiracy theory after conspiracy theory comes out after Clinton on a daily basis, and a good chunk of what is said turns out to be true. Her problems are almost all concerning actions, but her problems with words somehow surpass Annoying Orange's, because everything she's caught doing she immediately lies about and oftentimes doesn't stop lying even after it's been proven to be 100% true.
Actions speak louder than words. Someone who makes fun of a girl in school may either be shy and subtly coming on to them, or they may be actual bullies. Someone who beats up a girl in school for no reason is a bully. Period.
Poll