This is a fully transitioned man. The overwhelming majority of transgender individuals are not and will never be fully transitioned or go through surgery. Take for this case, there is no difference between Mr. Man and somebody crossdressing. The appropriate bathroom would be the male's restroom.
Unless you're pulling down everyone's pants and inspecting their genitals when they walk into the bathroom, trans people do not outwardly indicate their love. That guy whose picture I linked could very well still have a vagina and walk into a male bathroom, right? How he appears when clothed is entirely doable with just
http://HRT or
makeup. (The makeup person is a crossdresser and not trans, but a trans person could just as easily be using makeup to change their appearance) So you don't need surgery or even HRT to pass this "pass by looks" standard. A majority of trans people transition in one of these ways, or at least the way they present themselves is
androgynous to the point where they could pass for either love.
Which is what makes this "by looks" standard very stupid.
what i'm talking about is neither side, that this issue is not an issue
I think it's important that trans people be allowed to use some public bathroom where they don't feel threatened.
This wouldn't be an issue if regressive state legislatures/city legislatures around the country weren't trying to ban trans people from public restrooms.
Edit: replying to Akio's edit
If you are not physically another love in any way shape or form, you do not have the right to complain about not being able to use their bathroom. The rest of the world is not obligated to conform to LGBTQ feelings.
What do you define as "physically another love"? How do you draw lines to define someone's appearance as "male" or "female"?