pie crust needs to loving stop

[IkeTheGeneric]

Animals have been known to show signs of consent.

you have problems

[Ad Bot]

[King Tøny]

you have problems

For stating a scientific fact?

I'm not making an opinion, I'm stating a fact.

[King Tøny]

I have a problem for stating a scientific fact that has been well documented in animal biology and chemical reactions?

[IkeTheGeneric]

"Scientific fact" suuuure tony

[bloody jumper]

chemical reactions

What you're feeling right now is just chemical reactions Tony, it's fine.

[King Tøny]

"Scientific fact" suuuure tony

So you say they don't consent.

So when a female dog sticks its ass in the air to attract a male dog, is that not consent?

If a female dog does not consent to a male dog the female dog will proceed to bite the male dog.

[Master Matthew²]

I have a problem for stating a scientific fact that has been well documented in animal biology and chemical reactions?

Here's a Scientific Fact, just because you can, doesn't mean you should.

[Nix the Glaceon]

learn to put all your stuff in one post jesus Christ

Just because Pie Crust can legally have love with dogs doesn't mean we should tolerate his bestiality lust anymore than fursuit love.

so basically raping a dog against its conscent (animal abuse) is about as bad as having love with a regular human being but in a Halloween costume
your logic is so loving flawed

So it's hypocritical to get mad at Pie Crust for posting bestiality in your NSFW furry love chats.

*posts picture of someone's snake exploding*
"dude ur a hypocrite for getting mad at me............ it was an nsfw chat................."
also it wasn't even my discord

The only reason you knew he was doing this because you were in a NSFW furry love chat.

first off I had the channel blocked, I just went in there to take snapshots
and it wasn't even a "love chat" in the first place. as unova stated, it was for things too hardcore for normal nsfw channels. if you want to roast and/or bait someone, atleast put some loving research into it

You can claim fursuit love is legal and a socially acceptable thing to do all you want but in certain parts of the world bestiality is also legal and socially acceptable.

So you can't really use this excuse about what is or isn't "legal."

fursuit love is legal but it isn't socially acceptable, and i'd presume the same with bestiality in argentina judging by news articles

I am not defending bestiality as you keep claiming I am to deflect the argument.

then why are you supporting pie crust posting bestiality? admit it u want in on some of that dog ass don't u

I am claiming that I find it hypocritical of you and all the other furries here when the two worlds of zoophiles and furries are strangly similar.

wanting to forget a cartoon caricature of an animal ≠ wanting to rape a real animal

get the richard out of your brain and leave this thread

[King Tøny]

fursuit love is legal but it isn't socially acceptable, and i'd presume the same with bestiality in argentina judging by news articlesl

Oh yeah like the infamous Argentinian article "Farming family accused of bestiality after baby goat is born with ‘human’ face"
 

then why are you supporting pie crust posting bestiality? admit it u want in on some of that dog ass don't u

I don't know how many times I have to say I'm not supporting him for you to get it, lol.

I hate both fursuit and bestiality.

I find it hypocritical you accept furphilia but not zoophilia.

[HellHound]

@tony
Just because you can post, doesn't make it okay.

[King Tøny]

as unova stated, it was for things too hardcore for normal nsfw channels.

Sounds worse than a normal love chat.

You people did want "hardcore" furry action, I suppose. As the chat said unova let Pie Crust do it.

[King Tøny]

It is hypocritical to have hardcore furry love chatrooms and then later bitch when someone goes a little too far with the furry stuff.

[King Tøny]

Both parties in this situation are guilty of something.

[Nix the Glaceon]

Oh yeah like the infamous Argentinian article "Farming family accused of bestiality after baby goat is born with ‘human’ face"

even though it's stupid it does show that bestiality is frowned upon
if it wasn't the article would not exist
also you're a hypocrite if you think you can call news stuff

I don't know how many times I have to say I'm not supporting him for you to get it, lol.

because you aren't saying that pie crust is in the wrong for posting bestiality?

I hate both fursuit and bestiality.

doubt it tbh

I find it hypocritical you accept furphilia but not zoophilia.

legally "furphilia" is accepted while bestiality is not
I myself dislike both of them strongly

Sounds worse than a normal love chat.

it isn't even a love chat you got damn handicap
nsfw channels are for posting imagery or topics that people don't want to be seen looking at while working or at school

You people did want "hardcore" furry action, I suppose. As the chat said unova let Pie Crust do it.

1. we made it because we didn't want pie crust posting his disgusting garbage in the regular nsfw chat
2. he forgot pie crust existed because he muted the channel and pie crust

It is hypocritical to have hardcore furry love chatrooms and then later bitch when someone goes a little too far with the furry stuff.

well I mean it's perfectly normal for someone to react strongly when someone repeatedly breaks discord's tos

[King Tøny]

because you aren't saying that pie crust is in the wrong for posting bestiality?

He is in the wrong but when there are NSFW hardcore furry love chatrooms and Pie Crust is invited to it then you're pretty much asking for it.